Some solutions for Sri. Srikanth's questions
From the Bhakti List Archives
• January 21, 1997
Sri Srikanth wrote: >>Dear Sri Sampath Rengarajan and other Bhagavathas, >>I just wished to make a small point. Please excuse me if i have missed some >>detail in raising it. >Sri Sampath wrote:- >>> If Lord Sriman narayana has >>desired that the varnasara darmam has to be dumped or changed his messengers >>would have done so. >>Can the fact of many beings not having attained the Lotus Feet of the Lord >>be taken as evidence that the Lord has not desired it? Dear Sri Srikanth, I appreciate your thoughtful analysis. It is my ignorance again that I didnot expect someone to pull this out and explain theory of non linearity as applied to this. That was a very smart thought of yours to apply theory of non linearity to this. Let me submit my small inference here. The fact is such that many of the souls *here*, have taken birth to serve sriman narayana in this boolOgam. This is the surrednered souls one time desire and Lord's desire as well that certain people are born again after several centuries to serve the Lord. Untill it is totally realised by such souls everything may look little complicated to those souls themselves and to most other baddha jivaatmaas as well. >>Surely not!! The fact >>that some situation is not otherwise than it is is not necessarily evidence >>that the Supreme, in His infinite patience, did not desire it otherwise. If this is implied to dumping varnasara darmam, all i had to say is that my achaaryaaLs can never be wrong. I have been advised by srivatsangachaar that even if i do research it should only serve to further the lines of poorvaavcharaayaaLS school of thought and not derive my own nonlinear and hypothetical conclusions that contradict poorvaacharyaaLs school of thoughts. Meaning that the Lord sent poorvacharaaYaLs (including his amsams (is Lord HIMself) azwaars and Sri Ramanujar, Swami desikan and many other achaaryaaLS) to keep us track this path and not get diverted due to modern approaches and soultion procedures. >> I am not saying that human ignorance is so great that even He can't remove >>it. I agree that i am very ignorant as compared to many other baagwathaaLS who are reading poorvaachaaryaaLS work throughly. >> No, only that the nature of the relationship of the jeevas to the Brahman is >> mysterious, and the logic that determines many events of the jeeva's life is >> of "non-linear" type!! The realtionship is mysterious to many who are not aware of poorvaachaaryaaLS works (that narrate this relationship) and including those who are otherwise speculating and thinking that they can attempt to *define* this relationship with the material (math) knowledge they have gained. If the knowledge is a (muth knowledge (meaning that the knowledge is gained from achaaryaaLS muth schools) it may help. For a surrendered soul it (this realtionship) is not that complicated. Sri Srikanth if you will take it in good sportive math type chit chat let me pass on my math soultion to you and please forgive me for not providing a detailed solution procedure and the exact algorithm. As an aside I want to make *one more* "solution" for your "non-linear" problem. If it is not *very* nonlinear then please try piecewise linear approach by making it into "several pieces" of "linear type". For an adequately accurate solution, you may also want to note this. At each time you start a new "linear type" piece in continum it may be erraneous to continue to march on the solution seeking as it is. This is due to the problem of *discontinuity* that contributes this *nonlinearity* in the "original" system. So you cannot start it with the end conditions of the previous strip as you need to find a new set of initial conditions to restart this process with a help of a root finder type algorithm. This is proved by many mathematicians as a valid approach. Please forgive me for my ignorance and also if i have hurt your or anyother baagwathaaLS sentiments in this. >> HARI OM >> Srikanth Sri Ranganaayikaa samethra sri Ranganatha swami paadhukE charaNam Sampath Rengarajan
- Next message: Satyan, Nagu (MSMAIL): "Thanks to Sri Sadagopan"
- Previous message: RANGASWAMY_at_plh.af.mil: "(no subject)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]