(no subject)
From the Bhakti List Archives
• January 21, 1997
Dear Members of the Bhakti List, Recent discussions on the group have brought out a number of issues which plague us all in our day to day life. How do we reconcile with the fact that we are living in an ever changing world and as a result how do we view the principles and practices of our religion in this context? Srimans Dileepan and Sampath Rengarajan presented very eloquent accounts about this subject. I particularly liked Sri Rengarajan's note about how our elders, when their situation did not permit them to adhere to the principles laid down by our Purvacharyas, waited for the opportune moment (after retirement from service) to practice the prescribed injunctions. Srimans Vidyasankar, I.K. Rengarajan, Vijay Srinivasan and Sudarshan make valid points in their respective posts. I have been a member on this list for almost two years and during this period, I have gained a lot from the informative articles of Srimans Sadagopan, Anbil Ramaswamy, Rengarajan, Dileepan, Mani, Jaganath, Sudarshan, Kalale, Vihay Srinivasan, Tatachar and many other devout Bhagavatas. Sri Sudarshan brilliantly mirrored my thoughts in his recent post. I thank all the devout Bhagavatas for their time, effort, and dedication to disseminate knowledge of our Kula Dhanam. However, I have also observed a disturbing trend. Writings of several Prapannas have been subjected to microscopic scrutiny and intense vitriolic attack, while repeated transgressions and intemperate outbursts on the part of some have gone on unchecked (without even a token condemnation) and worse still, encouraged which leads me to ask the question: Does this smack of double standards? We must bear in mind that each one makes a tremendous sacrifice of time and energy to write about Bhagavad Vishayam. Furthermore, we do not have ready access to Acharyas and VyakhyAnams being so far away from India. Hence, the efforts of contributors must be respected and appreciated. If we disagree with someone's position let us do so respectfully and not indulge in name calling. With that, let me urge that all Bhagavatas return invigorated and focus on the main purpose of this group, i.e., Bhagavad Guna Anubhavam. I take a big share of the blame for the present controversy since it was my post on Tirumazhisai Azhwar which fanned a lot of flames. With the Azhwar's TN fast approaching (Jan 25, 1997), let us bury our differences and spend our energies in a productive manner. To this end, I shall post two articles from Garuda PuraNam detailing the Vaibhavam of Garuda. I seek forgiveness for being candid. It is not my intention to hurt anyone. Namo Narayana, Muralidhar Rangaswamy
- Next message: Shashikanth Hosur: "Re: Nrisimha Priya of North America"
- Previous message: Mohan Sagar: "jAti in SriVaishnavism"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]