Re: vaidehi Raja's comment
From the Bhakti List Archives
• January 16, 1997
At 6:21 AM 01-17-97, I.K. Rengarajan wrote: >I may think because those non brahmin >households were not acceptably " conducive" for folks like us to >interact. >They were meat eaters basically, and most of them were unclean. I am >sure this concern would have been the very basis for their abstinence >from mingling with them. Again it is the " view point". I am sure most >of you would agree with me. Too much has been made of vegetarianism here for this point to go unmade. We seem to accept vegetarianism as holy writ. Please refer to any of the many standard texts on the Jaminiya Brahmana (probably the best translated - though van Buitenen's Vadhula Shrauta Sutra is pretty good too) for proof of the following facts. We should all be aware the Vedas (and I mean the four - not later revisionistic Upanishadic afterthoughts) are hymns meant for the rite of sacrifice. The best kept secret of our religion, the Brahmanas, which are the "formula books" that expand on the modalities of sacrifice and tell wonderful archetypal myths connected to the angas of sacrifice provide explicit directions for : 1. The sacrifice of cows 2. The sacrifice of various other animals, including the horse in the ashvamedha 3. Human sacrifice also. Prince Rohita's father had promised him to Varuna, but the father of Shunahshepa gave him (Shunahshepa) as an acceptable substitute. This was the Shunahshepa that was adopted by Vishvaamitra and renamed Devaraata (a slightly more dignified name than Shunahshepa ;)) and named him the eldest of his sons. 4. How the products of the sarifice (this means 'unclean meat', folks!) were to be shared among the brahman, ritvik, adhvaryu, hotri and shamitri priests - all of whom were definition brahmins =). How about it, folks ? In case you haven't heard, the Brahmanas are accepted as shruti - divinely inspired, and are included in the general reference to "Vedic" works. The stricture of vegetarianism is a very late development in Hinduism, probably a reactionary development to Buddhism. In one of the more obviously later portions of the aanushaasanika parva in the Mahabharata, Yudishtira recieves advice on the merits of vegetariansim from Bheeshmachaarya, but not without protestations about how good meat is and tastes =) In interesting 'caste' links to this story, Shunahshepa declares his father to be not a brahmin. Though a brahmin by birth, his father agreed to bind him for teh sacrifice and kill him, in exchange for three thousand cows. His clan (gotra) sided with Shunashepa in this. Vihswamitra's 50 younger sons refused to accept Shunahshepa as their elder. The legend says these younger sons were cursed to be barbaras, andhras, dramidas and other 'inferior' races =). We may have mostly adopted vegetariansim now, but it was not the way it always was. Let's keep that in mind while tossing around epithets like "unclean" rather easily. Regards, Sundar
- Next message: Mani Varadarajan: "guru parampara prabhaavam"
- Previous message: Vijay Srinivasan: "Viewpoints"
- Maybe in reply to: I.K. Rengarajan: "vaidehi Raja's comment"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]