Disagreement vs. Apachara
From the Bhakti List Archives
• January 16, 1997
I would like to clarify that what follow are thoughts in general that are not intended to question or offend anyone. In the process, if I do commit bhagavatha apacharam (unknowingly ofcourse), I beg forgiveness. Mani's contributions and comments in this often erudite forum, not withstanding his efforts in putting all this together, have always stood out for their temperence of tone and rational thought. Given the conditional, subjective nature of deciding what constitutes apacharam and what does not, all progressive exchanges would be halted in their primacy if one were to be guided by the fear of offending someone or the other, as has often been the case in this forum . I am quite surprised when people pull in our Acharyas to support often rationally and philosophically untenable positions. Instances from Sri Emberumaanaar's life abound about his karuNa and open mindedness in sharing his insights with people from different facets of life. I am sure most in this forum are familiar with his efforts in including a large number of Sri VaishNavaas from different walks (and varNAshramAs) of life into the fold of bhakti and prapatti. The life of Pillai UrangAvilli dasan is another good example of the inherent kindness and liberal attitudes that our beloved Emberumaanaar practiced. Given this background, it pains one's sentiments to see expressions that seek to support our ignorance and insular views with references of tacit approval from our poorvacharyars. Someone yesterday even went so far as to indicate that there are objectionable parts to the Prasthanatrayi in the context of VarNAshrama Dharma. Such utterances, I feel, represent the type of superficial carelessness our philosophical treatises ought not to be treated with. No person intimately familiar with the exalted nature of rational thought and open minded inquiry in these wonderful storehouses of knowledge would make such statements. I am reasonably familiar with both Srimad Bhagavadgita and the principal upanishads (Isa, kena, katha, Prasna, Mundaka, Mandukya, Taitheriya, Aithreya, Chandogya and BrihadaraNyaka). BadarAyaNa's Brahma Sutras (the third part of the prasthana thrayi) are said to reflect the essence of the upanishads. While it is possible to interpret support for VarNashrama dharma from such statements as ChathurvaNyam mayA srishTam guNa karma VibhAgayoho (BG, 4-13) the second part of the sentence very clearly enunciates that it is people's guNa (mental attitudes) and karma (actions) that determine the varNa. >From my perspective, correctness (clearly subjective) stems from conditioning. For someone like me (raised in then-kalai vaishnavaite tradition), it is disconcerting to see erroneous statements from many learned vadakalai scholars in this forum about our tradition and pooravacharyas (there is clearly very little reference to works of great acharyas such as Azhagiya maNavaLa perumaaL Naayanaar, NumpiLLai, maNavaaLa maamunigal, piLLai loka charyar to name a few). Some one recently even referred to vaDakku thiru Veedui piLLai as thiru vadakku veedhi piLLai! However, I do realize that one can only reflect ideas and thoughts that one has been exposed to. A spirit that promotes open minded inquiry, and yes, tolerance for one another's view points (irrespective of the age of the bhagavathas involved in the exchange) would serve to promote the cause of this admirable forum that Sri Mani has put together. If not for any other reason, we can abide by what Sri PiLLai lokacharyar says, anukoolar pakkal anaadaraththaiyyum prathikoolar pakkal praavaNyaththaiyyum upekshikkumavar pakkal apekshaiyyum... ....... NAICCHYAM JANMA SIDDHAM After all, don't we all fade into insignificance in the incredible glow of SrimannArayaNa's divinity? In that case, inferiority is inherent to all of us in reference to the Supreme, and till that fact is recognized (and we stop splitting hairs about who is and is not a brahmin), one will continue to wallow in the miasma of one's own ignorance. Aazhwaar Emberumaanaar Jeeyar ThiruvadigaLe SharaNam Sridhar
- Next message: sudarsan_at_bessel.ame.arizona.edu: "Forms of Bhakthi.."
- Previous message: I.K. Rengarajan: "comment"
- Next in thread: V Sundar: "Re: Disagreement vs. Apachara"
- Maybe reply: V Sundar: "Re: Disagreement vs. Apachara"
- Maybe reply: Parthasarati Dileepan: "Re: Disagreement vs. Apachara"
- Maybe reply: Parthasarati Dileepan: "Re: Disagreement vs. Apachara"
- Maybe reply: Parthasarati Dileepan: "Re: Disagreement vs. Apachara"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]