Re: Disagreement vs. Apachara
From the Bhakti List Archives
• January 16, 1997
At 10:04 AM 01-16-97, M Srinivasan wrote: >It pains me to see Sri. Mani being accused of bhaagavata apachaara. I do not >know how many of us are fully familiar with all the writings (and other I fully agree with Sri Srinivasan's sentiments. I propose we declare a moratorium on the phrase "bhagavata apachara" . This has of late and all too often been used to void any spirit of enquiry or free thought on several issues. We truly value our members who have much to share with us from the tradition. However, it is the duty of each generation to know the tradition and apply it to their lives. If this is not done in a pirit of honesty and sharing, religion is reduced to an endless (and futile) rearguard action against any change. And, we must admit, religion HAS changed. In fact, some of our acharyas that traditionalists and others revere have been active agents of that change. If we don't allow ourselves to think about it, then tradition becomes what was past. This is not something we can allow to happen to SriVaishnavism. So how about it ? No more mandatory objections of "bhagavata apacharam" ? Best Wishes to all, Sundar
- Next message: Parthasarati Dileepan: "Re: Disagreement vs. Apachara"
- Previous message: M Srinivasan: "Disagreement vs. Apachara"
- Maybe in reply to: Sridhar Srinivasan: "Disagreement vs. Apachara"
- Next in thread: Parthasarati Dileepan: "Re: Disagreement vs. Apachara"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]