Ramayanam
From the Bhakti List Archives
• January 20, 1996
Date: Sat, Jan 20, 1996 01:29 AM EDT From: Tatachar Subj: Ramayana To: prapatti@srirangam.esd.sgi.com Here are some more thoughts about the apparent discrepancies in Valmiki Ramayana: 1. Bhagavatha apacharam by Sita towards Lakshmana (forced him out to go to Rama's assistance with abusive words at the deer episode) and Hanuman (refused to be carried by him back to Rama). 2. Sita accompanied Rama to forest, against the will of all the elders including Rama concerned. Holier than thou attitude. Because of #1 and 2, Sita had to suffer abduction and banishment. 3. Rama caused deep pain to Bharatha and Kaikaeyi (also to kausalya and Sumithra) by not returning to Ayodhya when they requested him to return. After all it is quite clear that Dasharatha never wanted Rama to go to forest. It was Kaikeyi's idea. So when Kaikeyi retracted her demand of Rama's exciled, where is the need for Rama insisting to fulfill his word to Dasharatha? As a result of the pain he caused, his judgement was blurred at the sight of the deer and Sita was abducted. 4. Rama ceased to be an avataram after fulfilling the task of killing Ravana. Then on he was just a noble King of the Raghuvamsha. (Did not remarry after banishment of Sita, although his noble father had 3 wives. The reason for this is that Dasharatha did not have progeny, so he was trying; however, Sita was pregnant at the time of banishment). 5. To make the narrtaion more dramatic, and challenging, the poet Valmiki may have introduced some of these turns and twists. 6. Just as the few cloudy days and the eclipse do not taint the Sun in any big or permanaent way, so also these turns and twists do not impact the glory of Rama. 7. These instances that are boggling to us may as well be there as dhrushti bhottus (to ward of evil eyes) for the nearly perfect characters of Rama and Sita. As we know, it is difficult to make fine jewelery with 24 carrot gold, so a small amount of inferior metal is added to work the gold! Sincerely, K. Sreekrishna(tatachar)
- Next message: Ramesh Sarangapani: "an appeal to asthikas"
- Previous message: Jaganath.Bharadwaj_at_nrecatao.nreca.org: "Re: Time of Attainment of Moksha."
- Next in thread: Tatachar_at_aol.com: "Re:Ramayanam"
- Maybe reply: Tatachar_at_aol.com: "Re:Ramayanam"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]