Re: Rama's treatment of Sita
From the Bhakti List Archives
• January 17, 1996
On Jan 17, 8:49pm, Shashikanth Hosur wrote: > But In his talks Ramana Maharshi says that the actions of person who has > realised his self may seem ordinary but he beyond them. This discussion is purely in the context of Rama as a the embodiment of dharma. As such, we are taught to look to Rama's behavior as a guide. To say that his behavior is ``beyond our understanding'' is a copout. > I think it is also valid to raise the question that is > it correct for draupadi to marry five brothers? This is not the question that was raised. The morality of polyandry from an absolute standpoint is not the question Lakshmi asked. Rather, it is whether it is not misogynistic for the epic to judge Draupadi as a loose woman because she married five husbands, despite the fact that she was forced into such a wedding. And whether it was proper to judge her in that way considering men were allowed to marry as many times as they wished. The dharma that is outlined in the Mahabharata and Ramayana is never as clear as our elders and acharyas make it seem. Mani
- Next message: Shashikanth Hosur: "Re: Rama's treatment of Sita"
- Previous message: Shashikanth Hosur: "Re: Rama's treatment of Sita"
- Maybe in reply to: Mani Varadarajan: "Rama's treatment of Sita"
- Next in thread: Shashikanth Hosur: "Re: Rama's treatment of Sita"
- Reply: Shashikanth Hosur: "Re: Rama's treatment of Sita"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]