Re: Seervarisai
From the Bhakti List Archives
• January 17, 1996
Lakshmi N. Srinivasa wrote: * Infact our acharyas should also take up the social reform part. Like if * some jeer passes a rule that one should not or give dowry or some sort of * tat rule, atleast the mutt followers will fear for the leader to some * extent. This might not actually destroy the problem but might alleviate * the problem to some extent. There are far more important social problems to be tackled than this dowry problem where our Acharyas can do a lot. Of course, I have no right to suggest to our Acharyas what they can and should do. Let us look at some of the numbers here. If you consider the Sri Vaishnava Acharyas (the 3 VK and all the TK jeeyars put together), their followers are primarily the Vaishnava Brahmins (the rest are a few Chettiyars and other castes), mainly from Tamil Nadu and a few from Karnataka and Andhra. This perhaps numbers at best about 50,000. The population of India is approximately 1,000,000,000. (Sri K.Srinivasan once posted an estimated number of Iyengars (who should constitute about 90% of the Sri Vaishnavas). That figure, I guess, was of the same order as the one I have quoted above.) Unlike the Kanchi Shankaracharya (for example), the Sri Vaishnava Acharyas do not command mass following from among the other sections of the society. In fact, outside of Sri Rangam and Kanchipuram, non-brahmins (who must constitute about 95-97% of the Hindus of TN) would have hardly even heard of the Sri Vaishnava Acharyas. None of my neighbours in Nagapattinam knows about the Sri Vaishnava Acharyas. Some could recognize the azhagiya singar immediately after the completion of the Sri Rangam South Raja Gopuram. But that was it. Of course, what fraction of this 50,000 will listen to our Acharyas when it comes to the lowkika aspects of the life, is itself questionable. --badri -------------------------------------------------- S.Badrinarayanan Graduate Student Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Cornell University --------------------------------------------------
- Next message: vidya_at_cco.caltech.edu: "Re: Rama's treatment of Sita"
- Previous message: Lakshmi N Srinivasa: "Re: Seervarisai"
- In reply to: Lakshmi N Srinivasa: "Re: Seervarisai"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]