Re: Seervarisai
From the Bhakti List Archives
• January 17, 1996
On Jan 17, 7:34am, krish wrote: > This points out the need for defining the > ethics of SriVaishnavism. I have always felt that the > leadership of Acharyas is missing in many social refroms. Krish makes a good point here. Why is it that in spite of the precedents set by Ramanuja, Pillai Lokacharya, and Manavala Mamunigal, our acharyas lack social vision and don't care to engage in any kind of reform activity? This is perhaps why the Mutts have lost a following. While they still attract Vedic scholars, they have marginalized themselves in terms of the greater society. Mani
- Next message: Lakshmi N Srinivasa: "Re: Seervarisai"
- Previous message: Mani Varadarajan: "Rama's treatment of Sita"
- Maybe in reply to: krish: "Seervarisai"
- Next in thread: Lakshmi N Srinivasa: "Re: Seervarisai"
- Reply: Lakshmi N Srinivasa: "Re: Seervarisai"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]