Fwd: Re: Response to Mrs. Anonymous's question
From the Bhakti List Archives
• January 16, 1996
--------------------- Forwarded message: From: RANGASWAMY@plh.af.mil To: Tatachar@aol.com Date: 96-01-16 09:37:35 EST Dear Sreekrishna, I would like to add to your list of unexplainable actions in the Ramayana. (1) The maiming of Shoorpanaka (It was the rule in those days that a woman approaching a man in love should not be spurned, much less maimed.). Also, I beg to disagree with another aspect of your post: "Rama tested Sita's chastity for himself". This seems to imply that Rama doubted Sita's chastity while she was in Ravana's Ashoka Vanam. I don't think the Lord ever doubted Sita's single minded devotion and dedication to him. Testimony in support of this fact can be obtained from the Lord's reaction upon hearing Anjaneya's narration after returning from Lanka. It was only to establish to the rest of the world that Sita had not been tainted even though she spent several years in Ravana's Ashoka Vanam that Rama required her to go through the Agni-Pariksha. This was also done with the view that no stigma should be attached either to him (the Lord) or to the Raghu dynasty. Best Wishes, Muralidhar Rangaswamy
- Next message: Lakshmi N Srinivasa: ""Tatachar's views""
- Previous message: Tatachar_at_aol.com: "Fwd: suggestions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]