(no subject)
From the Bhakti List Archives
• January 4, 1996
>From: VISH@novell.com (Vish Vishwanath) Since Buddha is recent historic figure, it should be easy to point to (a) just who were the "bad ones" and (b) how was their "downfall" implemented. .... unless, the Buddha who is considered an avatara is not the same as Gautama, the Buddha. >>> Raghu Seshadri01/03/96 01:51pm >>> The Buddha is said to have preached un-vedic and therefore untruthful things to sow confusion and bring about the downfall of the bad ones. __________________________________________________________ The Buddha referred to is the one and only Buddha. The rationale of the argument is as follows - the Vedas are the truth. the Buddha preached unvedic things. to receive unvedic teachings, to believe them and to do unvedic acts is a sure way to one's downfall in the next births. So whoever followed the Buddha was destined for this downfall and was by definition a bad one. Later on, more liberal elements appeared on the hindu scene ( as they always do, God bless them ) and went so far in rectifying matters as to incorporate the Buddha into avatardom. RS
- Next message: Jaganath.Bharadwaj_at_nrecatao.nreca.org: "Re: Acharam"
- Previous message: Raghu Seshadri: "(no subject)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]