Re: Doubts reg: Vali Vadham
From the Bhakti List Archives
• January 30, 2003
Dear Lakshminarasimhan, For your argument "IF IT WERE AN INNOCENT DEER, RAMA WOULDN'T KILL IT FOR SITA" , please refer Ayodhya Kandam Sargam 56 Slokam 25 to 32..It says clearly that RAMA asks Lakshmana to bring flesh of black Deer towards conducting Vasthu Shanthi for the Parnashaala. Lakshmana does that too. Kindly refer all the slokas which I have quoted and all are from Valmiki Ramayanam which our acharyas have been taking as a reference. Iam not quoting anything from external works. So there seems to me lot of hidden secrets in Marichan vadham too as Vali Vadham. We need to have dharmam as a reference when analysing Itihasams like ramayanam and mahabaratham not mere Bhakthi. Regards, Nanmaaran. "Lakshmi Narasimhan" wrote:Srimathe Ramanujaya Namaha Dear Shri Swamin, Still missing the point!!! If the deer were an innocent one Rama would not have killed it and skinned it. My mail was an explanation to Smt Swati's mail. Her question was that when Seeta asked Rama to bring the deer back why did Rama Kill? Your answer was that Sita asked him to kill it if he can't get it alive. I felt that you should not have stopped with that because this would de-face Shri Rama's lakshanam. Point was that Rama KNEW that it was Mareecha(Lakshmana did warn him). And hence the killing of the deer is justified and the skinning of it too. Please don't miss to see the point I was stressing:) IF IT WERE AN INNOCENT DEER, RAMA WOULDN'T KILL IT FOR SITA. Everything worked out as per the plan - i.e Sita asked for the deer, which Rama could afford to kill(only because he knew that it was Mareecha). Perspective does matter! Killing Mareecha and skinning him is never denied. Archive Reference: http://www.ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/nov96/0065.html Reference - Swami Desikan - Raghuveera Gadhyam: mAricha mAyA mruga charma parikarmitha nirbhara dharbhAstharaNa ! Jaya! Jaya ! Translation - O Lord whose darbhAsanam is decorated by the skin of the deceitful mArichA , who appeared before You as a beautiful deer ! Hail to Thee! Hail to Thee! It is very easy to quote from literature if one knows the language of the literature and go through it. I would definitely love to quote the literature. But, as per our Shri Vaishnava Sampradayam, we learn from our elders and literatures are just for reference(not for interpretation). People need to know the appropriate context, the justification and the INNER meaning behind the same - which is done only by learned scholars in the tradition based on what they learnt from their acharyas(traces back to purvacharya) - and this is what I attempted i.e just provide the explanation given by elders. Kindly apologise my ignorace! Adiyen Ramanuja Dasan, Lakshmi Narasimhan Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Group Home: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bhakti-list Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: Sukumar: "RE: "Adbhuta KEsarI""
- Previous message: Sukumar: "RE: "Adbhuta KEsarI""
- Maybe in reply to: M.K. Krishnaswamy: "Doubts reg: Vali Vadham"
- Next in thread: Hari Krishnan: "Re: Doubts reg: Vali Vadham"
- Reply: Hari Krishnan: "Re: Doubts reg: Vali Vadham"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]