Re: Ramanuja & Bhagavatam
From the Bhakti List Archives
Pradeep Janakiraman <pradeepjanakiraman_at_yahoo.com> • Unknown Date
There is no doubt that Bhagavatam preceeded 10th century AD or
Budhism, Jainism or any other religion.
There are long chapters about story of RishabaDeva but not as a Jain
Tirthankara. Secondly, in the very first skandha there is mention of
24-avatarams in which there is a reference to the advent of Buddha.
Also one should note that the "Paavai nombu" that Andal talks about
is similar in concept "kathyaayani nombu" observed by the gopis of
vraja, as an austerity so that they would be blessed with Krishna as
their husband. There is an extensive chapter in Bhagavatam, that
describes this austerity that the maids want to observe and going to
bathe in Yamuna etc. etc.
The opening verse of Tiruppavai, "margazhi thingal ...." directly
synchronizes with this chapter from 10th skandam "hemanthe pratame
maase, nanda-gopa kumarikaa..."
Bhagavatam did exist before Andal who was born around 97yrs after the
advent of Kali. It is a very old work.
But that does not still answer the point why Ramanuja or Sankara did
not make any references to it in their works. It becomes more
important when we note that they refer to Paadma and Vishnu puranams
and not refer to this.
--------------------------------------------------------------
- SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH -
To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com
Group Home: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bhakti-list
Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: Sukumar: "RE: nAcciyAr tirumozhi XIII- kaNNan ennum kar um deyvam 2"
- Previous message: Balakrishnan M: "Re: Ramanuja & Bhagavatam"
- In reply to: Malolan Cadambi: "Re: Ramanuja & Bhagavatam"
- Next in thread: K.P. Sarathy: "Re: Ramanuja & Bhagavatam"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
