Re: Ramanuja & Bhagavatam
From the Bhakti List Archives
• January 21, 2003
> I do not think Shankara had referenced to Bhagavatam either. There is a > theory that Bhagavatam came into existence much latter - 11 th or 12th > century, although it is attributed to Vyaasa. Same is true with respect > to Brahmasuutra-s of Badarayana. Vishal Agarwaal had a post related to > this. Ref: http://www.ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/feb2001/0180.html The Brahmasuutra-s are clearly pre-Buddhist and pre-jaina. This is in reference to the above URL and Sri Vishal's excellent post. However, Srimad Bhagavatam also does not have reference to Buddha and the jain thiirthankara, King Rishabha. This clearly puts the authorship of Srimad Bhagavatam much anterior to Gautama Buddha. Regards, Malolan Cadambi -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Group Home: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bhakti-list Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: Sukumar: "RE: nAcciyAr tirumozhi XIII- kaNNan ennum karum deyvam 2"
- Previous message: Malolan R Cadambi: "Swami Desikan at Satyakalam"
- In reply to: kuntimaddi sadananda: "Re: Ramanuja & Bhagavatam"
- Next in thread: Balakrishnan M: "Re: Ramanuja & Bhagavatam"
- Reply: Balakrishnan M: "Re: Ramanuja & Bhagavatam"
- Reply: Pradeep Janakiraman
: "Re: Ramanuja & Bhagavatam" - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]