Search:
Bhakti List Archives

Re: Kundalini etc.

From the Bhakti List Archives

Malolan Cadambi • January 20, 2003 


> Your statement "One cannot condemn all these" may be acceptable from a
> different view-point. If one takes ONLY the path of Vyakaranam, then that
is
> what is condemned. Similarly if one takes ONLY the yoga margam to attain
> moksham, then that is condemned.

The Angam-s are not mArgam-s. They cannot be confused for the other.

> Ramanujar and not of any specific "kalai" for there were no different
kalais
> except "Thenkalai Sampradayam"at the time of Shri Ramanujar. And hence
there
> was no necessity for me to explicitly mention "Thennacharya Sampradayam".
I

I would avoid commenting on that issue, since it is not in the charter of
the list. I would also not wish to conduct discussion off-list in this
matter.

But, for an independent view, you might wish to read Dr.Patricia Mummume's
book "Sri Vaishnava Theological Dispute".

Regards,

Malolan Cadambi
Austin,TX




--------------------------------------------------------------
           - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH -
To Post a message, send it to:   bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com
Group Home: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bhakti-list
Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/
 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/