Re: Kundalini etc.
From the Bhakti List Archives
• January 20, 2003
----- Original Message ----- From: "Lakshmi Narasimhan"> Vyakarana Shastram: Essence - OM - the shabdham itself is God. Condemned, No, they are not condemned. Vyakaranam, Niruktam, jyOtisham, et all are six angA-s of the vedam. One cannot condemn all these. Effectively, by condemning all these, you question the very authority of the angA-s of the veda. That would make you non-different from a nAstikA. Please do not write out the pranavam in open. It should not be done so. The AdhyAyam(or learning) of the vedA-agnAm is very important to vedic study. This cannot be avoided. This underscores to need to undergo traditional kalakshEpam under the feet of a sadAcharya. > those who are trapped in kaivalyam (it is one of the mokshams as mentioned > by our Purvacharyars) are never freed until the almighty really wants to > free them. And hence, Kaivalyam is probably the worst place one should not > go to. What you have stated is only the thennAcharya(thenkalai) viewpoint on kaivalyam. This discussion on this topic is beyond the scope of this list. Needless to say, what you have stated about kaivalyam cannot be accepted by all. I would request you to re-check with your achAryan about what you stated in your previous mail. Regards, Malolan Cadambi Austin,TX =========================================================================== Note from Moderator: On the comment of SrI Malolan Cadambi on kaivalyam, I would like to suggest that ideas of the different kalai's can be shared, as long as it is clarified that this is the position of the particular kalai. If the original writer does not know that a particular position is adopted by only one of the kalai's, the others can point out the fact in a spirit of sharing of information and knowledge. I would prefer not to cut out all reference to any kalai-oriented position, since then we will not learn. The intent should be not to force only one position as the "correct" one.). =========================================================================== -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Group Home: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bhakti-list Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: Lakshmi Narasimhan: "Re: Kundalini etc."
- Previous message: Malolan Cadambi: "Re: Kundalini etc."
- In reply to: Lakshmi Narasimhan: "Re: Kundalini etc."
- Next in thread: Lakshmi Narasimhan: "Re: Kundalini etc."
- Reply: Lakshmi Narasimhan: "Re: Kundalini etc."
- Reply: Anand Iyengar: "Question regarding Chanting of Vedas by women"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]