Re: pAnchAlii, Poyandary & mahAbhArata-upabrAhmaNam
From the Bhakti List Archives
• January 21, 2002
Dear Tg Ram, With regards to your question about polyandric character of Draupadi, le me provide some information based on my limited knowledge of the Mahabhrata. The case of Draupadi was exceptional according to Srila Vyasadeva as she prayed 5 times to Lord Siva to get good husbands in her previous life. In her previous life she was Nalayani. Let me recall the story of Nalayani that can be found in Mahabhrata itself. Nalayani was married to an old man called Mudagalya and she was always faithful to her husbands. Once Mudgalya was cursed by a rishi to die when the sun rises. Nalayani angrily said " if my husband must die at sunrise, then the sun must not rise again" The power of her chastity was great that the sun god himself came and the rishi withdrew his curse. It was stated Nalayani had great sexual desire and asked her husband to expand 5 parts to enjoy her and Mudagalya did according to her wish. (If I am not mistaken yogi's can expand up to 9 forms, I remember in Srimad Bhagavatham Kardama Muni expanded himself into 9 forms to satisfy Devahuti). After several years Mudagalya grew tired of sexual pleasures but not for Nalayani. Mudagalya was more interested in his spritual life. He cursed Nalayani that in her next birth she will have 5 husbands and she will enjoy sex with all 5 of them. After 5 times she prayed to Lord Siva to get a good husband, Lord Siva gave her a boon that she would have five husbands simultaneously. Hope it helps. Other acaryas/bhagavathas can provide answers for the rest of the question posted by Tg Ram. Bala Penang, Malaysia http://www.geocities.com/WallStreet/District/9622/resbala.html --- tg_ramwrote: > SrImatE nigamAnta mahAdESikAya nama: > > Dear Friends > > Any thoughts on the polyandric character of > draupatii ? > Unfortunately Itihaasa-s, being a truthful record of > history, had to > record even such disgusting events. > > Do vedantins reject such topics as irrelevant to > their interests? > > Do our aachaarya-s give mahaa-bhaarata (as well as > SrImad rAmAyaNam) > the status of upa-braahmaNam (ie valid supporting > scriptures) to > properly understand the apaurshEya-veda-s ? > > Do we simply ignore away such things in > smRti/itihaasa/puraaNa texts > that not directly relevant to adhyaatma-SAstra ? > > My question refers to upabraahmaNa-s _only_ . > > It is a different matter that some vedAntic schools, > just to suit > their own tailor-made philosophies, conveniently > reject even parts of > vedas they could not provide proper explanation for. > > > aDiyEn rAmkumAr rAmAnuja-dAsan > > " praNAmam lakshmaNa muni: pratigRhnatu mAmakam | > prasAdayati yat sUkti: svAdIna patikAm Srutim || > " > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - > To Post a message, send it to: > bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com > Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/ -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: kalaivani retnavellu: "bhakthi & prapati"
- Previous message: Asset-Enterprise Technologies: "Re: [SriRangaSri] saranagathi & karma===question"
- In reply to: tg_ram: "pAnchAlii, Poyandary & mahAbhArata-upabrAhmaNam"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]