Re Castiesm
From the Bhakti List Archives
• January 18, 2002
Poojya Swamin. I hope you wouldn't mind me joining the discussion in this regard. I submit at the outset, that I am a Satthatha Sri Vaishnava, a Mudaliar by birth. As a Sri Vaishnavaite, I have not faced any discrimination, which I can say "satyam satyam puna satyam, udhruthya pujamuchyathe!". When I got involved in Sri Vaishnavaite philosophy in 1988 and I just prayed to Sriman Narayana for initiating me by having Pancha Samskaram done through a sattvika acharya, I did not know anybody. The kindly God led me to Sri Sudarsanar Swamy of Puthur Agraharam, Trichy, who publishes Sri Vaishnava Sudarsanam magazine. My request was followed up by Sri Sudarsanar Swamy and Sri U.Ve. Prathivadi Bhayankaram Srinivasacharya swamy of Thirunangur kindly consented to have me as a Sishya. I was and am the only non-brahmin Sishya of the Thirumaligai. By this kind act, my Swamy gave me punarjanmam and through his kindness, definite moksham, which I definitely would not be entitled considering my backload of sins and sins only. Even during our celebrations of our Poorvacharya, Sri Prathivathi Bhayankaram Anna, our Swamy would ask me to sit by his side while having food, so that no discrimination is made. All the other sishyas have accepted me as one of their own. Even whenI go to temples, due to Lord's mercy and my Swamy's association, I get a heartfull darshan and blessings of Swamys. However, I always remember one thing - certain things are required of brahmins only and one should not interfere in such things unless specifically asked to do so. My Swamy, when he completed Pancha Samskaram for me and my wife, blessed us and said the following which is still fresh in mind and I always remember this and pray to God that I shall always act by it: " You have got bhakti and have done prapatti with the blessings of Sri Manavala Mamunigal and Sri Emperumarar. In due course, you will find many born-Sri Vaishnavaites not following their tenets. At that time, you should always remember the incident of Sri Hanuman being unable be defeated by the rakshasas of Sri Lanka, was bound by brahmastra of Indrajit and still the rakshasas, not trusting the brahmasatra, tied him in ropes. Hanuman realised that brahmastra went away and he could get himself released any time. It was because brahmastra does not relish any other utility with it. Similarly, prapatti does not go with ego. If ego develops, prapatti will vanish like brahmastra." Having born in a non-Sri Vaishnavaite family, I still could not believe myself, as to how Sri Thondaradipodi Alwar blessed me and initiated me in the renovation of his divya desam - thiru mandangudy- in 1994, a person who was born in chennai/kancheepuram and was not associated with Kumbakonam territory till then. The love and affection of many other Sri Vaishnavas bind me for ever. Hence in our Sri Vaishnavaite philosophy, Icould say with authority, that "our pandai kulam" is not considered at all, with the caveat that every one should know their limitations - not enter into terrirory of the upanayam-initiated vedic dvijas. It is Sriman Narayanan's dictat. Iam sorry for this very long message. I just couldn't bear with myself once I started this. Please forgive me for any intransgiencies inadvertently done- adiyen Selva narana ramanujan. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: Sadagopan: "Re: Sravanam dates"
- Previous message: Rajaram Venkataramani: "Re: regarding casteism Is there historic support ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]