ahimsA and vegetarianism
From the Bhakti List Archives
• January 15, 2001
Dear Esteemed Bhaktas, There was a question posed recently about the scriptural authority for vegetarianism. This core principle is derived from the Vedic injunction 'mA himsyAt sarva-bhUtAni' -- do no harm to living creatures. This recommendation is repeated to the disciple in some of the Upanishads. We further see that all the great spiritual traditions of India, drawing upon this root idea, dictate that the true spiritual aspirant must abstain as much as possible from injury to any living being. The followers of the Vedanta, the Buddhists, and most notably the Jains all keep ahimsA at the forefront of their spiritual sAdhana, and this is also reflected in many of the dharma-SAstras, including the famed manu-smRti. The ahirbudhnya-samhitA, a pAncarAtra text of paramount authority, states that since all creatures form the body of the Omnipresent Lord, it should be obvious (niScaya) that all one's actions should be performed with thoughts of all other beings' welfare. It is also said in the chAndogya upanishad, "If the food is pure, the mind becomes pure. If the mind is pure, meditation [on the paramAtman] becomes firm. Upon the attainment of such meditation, one is released from all knots of the heart (i.e., moksha is attained)." [ AhAra Suddhau sattva Suddhih; sattva Suddhau dhruva smRtiH; smRtilambhe sarvagranthInAm vipramokshaH ] The statement about food being pure is interpreted in the dharma- SAstras as meaning that not only their source, but also their *method of procurement* must be pure. Milk is no doubt pure; but if procured through harm to the cow, or through dishonest means, becomes tainted. So, Sri Ramanuja writes, the first thing to be practiced by a bhakti-yogi is 'viveka' -- being discriminating about what one takes in, particularly food, because it directly contributes to the purity or lack thereof of the mind. There is also the dialogue between Tuladhara and Jajali in the Mahabharata, which, remarkably, contains the seeds of the doctrines of all modern animal-rights movements. Please see http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/jul98/0180.html. In the texts particular to our sampradAya, our acharyas have repeatedly focussed on ahimsA and by extension vegetarianism as a cardinal value. Sri Vatsya Varadacharya, the parama-guru of Sri Vedanta Desika, cites an ancient sloka which describes ahimsA as the 'prathamam pushpam' or the first and foremost flower that pleases Lord Vishnu. This sloka is repeated in many of the later Ahnika texts during the archana phase of bhagavad-ArAdhanam. Sri Varadacharya also interprets nearly every aspect of saranagati in terms of love and compassion for one's fellow creatures. The quote above from ahirbudhnya-samhitA may once again be considered in this context. We see then a twofold reasoning at work. There is an absolute value of ahimsA that is at play, and in addition, this ahimsA helps the mumukshu in his or her spiritual progress by furthering the aspirant's sattva-guNa leading to purity of mind, further leading to the ability to realize the paramAtman. However, at the same time, it was recognized that samsAric life inherently involved injury of some form or another. The quote, if I am not mistaken, is 'jIvo jIvena jIvati' -- life lives by living off of another life. Vegetarians too commit harm, by killing plants, or using animals to plough the fields. One may also inadvertently harm human beings in the process of raising crops, or in the process of commerce. The conclusion is that no one in reality can live a cruelty-free existence. But we at the same time cannot abandon the core value of ahimsA. So what we are left with is that *as much as possible*, we must minimize the harm we cause to other creatures. Certainly, eschewing meat is possible for nearly all of us. (Clearly, eskimos and others who have no other means of sustenance are largely exempt from these dictums). And, in the process of eating our vegetarian diets, we should strive to atone for whatever himsA we cause in the process. In the Vedic tradition, this atonement comes as part of the daily performance of the panca-mahA-yajnas, the five great 'sacrifices'. The word 'yajna' scares off many people, these are unfortunately thought of as complex rituals. However, they are actually quite simple in spirit, and of the five yajnas, two were specifically designed with the idea of atoning for inevitable harm done in daily life, and take the form of positive acts of kindness and charity to one's fellow beings. These two are listed below, with recommendations from Sri Rangapriya Swami on how to fulfil them: (1) sacrifice to living creatures -- bhUta-yajna. Feed a fellow creature -- a cow, a dog, or bird, out of the kindness of your heart. (2) sacrifice to one's fellow humans -- manushya-yajna. Feed a guest or stranger to the extent possible, or do some charitable act of kindness for someone. As Sri Rangapriya Swami rhetorically asked us, "Tell me, how hard is this to perform every day? We make everything harder than it seems. In reality the shastras do not dictate such difficulty." I hope this answers the question to some extent. Any errors or gaps are mine and truly, anything correct can be attributed to Sri Rangapriya Swami. aDiyEn rAmAnuja dAsan, Mani -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@eGroups.com Search archives at http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/index.html#SEARCH Manage your subscription at http://www.egroups.com/mygroups
- Next message: Ramanathan Balasubramanyan: "Mantras/Shloka Books"
- Previous message: Venkatesh K. Elayavalli: "Re: Reply re : Aachryas"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]