Re: Reply re : Aachryas
From the Bhakti List Archives
Venkatesh K. Elayavalli • Fri Jan 12 2001 - 16:48:29 PST
>
> Ans for Qn 3
>
> In visishtadwitha system of philosophy, Mahalakshmi is considered in
every
> respect equal to Sriman Narayana including giving Moksha. In addn
she also
> acts as purushakara i.e recommend our case for consideration by
Sriman
The above statement is one of the major differences between
Vadakalai's and Tenkalai's. The above observation is consistent with
the former's interpretation. However, the Tenlkalai's consider only
Sriman Narayana to have the power to grant moksha. The status of Sri
is purely that of a Mediatrix. She occupies a position between the
Lord and the Acharya.
There are works by Sri Periyavaccan Pillai, that goes into details of
the nature of Sri and the relationship between the Acharya, Sri and
the Lord.
In a very simple terms, Thenkalai's view is that of
Fatherhood/Motherhood/Sonhood - where father is Lord Narayana, Mother
is Mahalskshmi (Sri) and Soul is equated to Son. In this scheme, only
the Father has the power to grant moksham.
Adiyen
Venkatesh Elayavalli
--------------------------------------------------------------
- SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH -
To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@eGroups.com
Search archives at http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/index.html#SEARCH
Manage your subscription at http://www.egroups.com/mygroups
- Next message: Mani Varadarajan: "ahimsA and vegetarianism"
- Previous message: Krishna Kalale: "FW: good talk"
- In reply to: SUNDAR RANGANATHAN: "Reply re : Aachryas"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
