Re: A question
From the Bhakti List Archives
• January 28, 2000
Vijayaraghavan Srinivasan writes: > The second line - does it imply that one should not turn around in circles > (standing at the same place)in front of perumAl sannidhy. This sems to be > contrary to the smArta practice of saying ....pradakshina padE padE where > they remain in one place and turnaround in circles. Does this slOka > disapprove that practice. I would request BhaghavatAs to clarify. It appears that it does disapprove. I cannot speak with certainty about this sloka, but I can extrapolate from other advice that if at all possible, one is to never turn one's back on Perumaal, especially as part of ritual practice. For example, even in sandhyAvandanam, Perumaal is given precedence over the sun (Aditya-maNDala-madhya-vartI nArAyaNa). If one is doing sAyam sandhyA in the ananta-saras in Kanchipuram Perumaal kOvil, for example, one offers the arghyam in the direction of Lord Varada, irrespective of where the sun is. In the dig-dEvatA pradakshina and namaskAra after the sandhyA, Kozhiyalam Swami recommends that we ensure that we not turn our back on Perumaal. I follow this practice if I am forced to do my sAyam sandhyA inside the house near our Perumaal sannidhi for some reason. > Similarly, VaishnavAs do not follow the practice of keeping the hands over > the arati and accepting it after the karpoora Arati is offered to PerumAl. It is not our practice to do this, but when asked, Sri Rangapriya Swami said it is "not wrong" to do this. daasan, Mani
- Next message: Diwakar Kannan: "Re: A question"
- Previous message: Vijayaraghavan Srinivasan: "A question"
- Maybe in reply to: L Kumar: "A question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]