Re: "muppadUm thappAmE" -- CONCLUSION
From the Bhakti List Archives
• January 17, 2000
--- ashwin sadhuwrote: > Dear Sri. Sampath, I am merely expressing > my take on the issue. I have no right to pass > judgement on you or anyone > else Dear Venkat, >From your posts I can see you are very young (definitely younger than I!) but please relax, and feel free to express yourself. Adiyen will never take it amiss as long as we post to each other in a friendly, conversational style and in a spirit of mutual enrichment.... "parasparam bhAvayantah:"... instead of trying to deliver sermons to each other. > I think we are approaching the issue from different > angles.> What do terms like "must become" and "Present-day"> imply? > Venkat Venkat, This is a very complicated subject but let's both continue to think aloud and see where our "differing angles" can converge, shall we? What I mean is very simply this: (1) SriVaishnava "sampradAya", or "tradition" as you have yourself defined it, is nowhere seen today to have the hold over people it had in its heydays. Why? (2) Some of the most basic and externally visible features of SriVaishnavam are (a) wearing "urdhvapundhram" (b) doing "trikAla-sandhyAvandanam" (c) undergoing "samAshrayanam" and (d) "kainkaryam". Tell me how prevalent are these external marks of "sampradAyam" visible in our lives? (3) How many children in SriVaishnava homes are taught by their own parents to recite "tiruppAvai"? How many of them grow up getting to naturally appreciate it as great religious poetry in the tradition of "srisampradAyam"? In how many homes do SriVaishnava families perform "tiru-ArAdana" to their domestic deities with those select, simple stanzas of the holy tiruppAvai adiyen explained in his post yesterday? (4) How many SriVaishnavas who join the "stampede" for the "sAtrumarrai-seva" at Tirumala realise the mockery they make of it when they clamour to get into it by hurriedly shaving off their "side-burns" and painting higgedly-piggedly "tirumann-srichurnam" on themselves? How many of them insist that inside the sanctum- sanctorum in the presence of the Lord the "sAtrumarrai" must be conducted with the somemnity and reverence that "sAtrumarrai-seva" must actually be held? Given a chance all of us will hold forth eloquently on the philosophical wealth contained in the Stanzas#29 and #30 of the tiruppAvai but to what use all those perorations if we allow the "tiruppAvai" to be short-changed during "sAtrumarrai" in our temples? What kind of "sampradAyam" is this? Please think about what adiyen is really trying to say. Adiyen writes more in sadness than in bitterness. And please do give your views too. Adiyen is always willing to listen to the other point of view especially from younger people with fresh minds. dAsan, Sampathkumaran __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com
- Next message: L&T-ECCG-Buildings & Factories: "KANNAPIRAAN PERRA VENNAIK KALVI- 5"
- Previous message: Sadagopan: "Some Feedback on the AchArya RaamAnujA CD ROM and related obsevations"
- Maybe in reply to: sampath kumar: ""muppadUm thappAmE" -- CONCLUSION"
- Next in thread: Venkat Nagarajan: "Re: "muppadUm thappAmE" -- CONCLUSION"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]