Re: "muppadUm thappAmE" -- CONCLUSION
From the Bhakti List Archives
• January 16, 2000
Dear Sri. Sampath, Before I comment on the last but one statement let me first clear a misunderstanding. I am not passing judgement on you; I am merely expressing my take on the issue. I have no right to pass judgement on you or anyone else as I am far less spritually eveolved than yourself and many others. That however, does not mean there is no truth in what I say. I think we are approaching the issue from different angles. Last but one Sentence: ...."sampradAyam" must become a living inspiration for all us present-day SriVaishnavas, both old and young, both learned and laymen and for both religious-minded and not-so religious-minded....". What do terms like "must become" and "Present-day" imply? -If they imply change then it goes against the fundamental premise that Vedanta is immutable truth. If these terms imply that the exposition must be presented in a different manner but without modifying the substance, then I agree with you. ramanuja dasan, Venkat
- Next message: Sadagopan: "Some Feedback on the AchArya RaamAnujA CD ROM and related obsevations"
- Previous message: sampath kumar: "Re: "muppadUm thappAmE" -- CONCLUSION"
- Maybe in reply to: sampath kumar: ""muppadUm thappAmE" -- CONCLUSION"
- Next in thread: sampath kumar: "Re: "muppadUm thappAmE" -- CONCLUSION"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]