Re:Official rebukes directed at Sri. Sampath Kumar
From the Bhakti List Archives
• January 6, 2000
Dear Bhagavatas I am sorry that the reply of Sri Sampathkumar in response to an innocuous query of a bhagavata (which I forwarded to him) on the apparent redundancy of the word "methenra" followed by "pancha sayanathin", had created some resentment. Even the Vyakhyana Chakravarthi would not have ventured to stifle further interpretations by researchers of posterity, as if, his was the last say in the matter. In fact, numerous Achrayas and research scholars after the times of PV Pillai have added and are continuing to add to the richness of interpretations almost perennially. This fact does not trivialize or detract from the eminence of PV Pillai's thoughtful inputs. I think that it was Abraham Lincoln who said something like this: " I hate your views but I will fight the whole world to see that your views are heard" Let us develop this tolerance in listening to what others have to say. I am one of those who appreciates a different view point that is ORIGINAL*so long as it is NOT REPUGNANT to the established Vyakhyanams of Poorva and Prakritam Acharyas*. This latter part is important. And, Sri Sampathkumar's explanations do just this and I would like to thank him for this. Dear Sri Sampthkumar, Please carry on, but remember the rider mentioned above. Dasoham Anbil Ramaswamy
- Next message: sampath kumar: "Re:Official rebukes directed at Sri. Sampath Kumar"
- Previous message: Balaji CG: "Thoopul divya desam"
- Maybe in reply to: Venkat Nagarajan: "Official rebukes directed at Sri. Sampath Kumar"
- Next in thread: sampath kumar: "Re:Official rebukes directed at Sri. Sampath Kumar"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]