The "brief" descriptions of the five Mathams
From the Bhakti List Archives
• February 5, 1999
>Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1999 20:04:45 -0500 >To: "Malolan Paduka Sevaka Net":; >From: Anand Srinivasan> >Dear Sriman. Sadagpoan, > >Could you (if possible) very briefly elaborate on each one >of the mathams below?> >adiYen >Anand > >>Sadagopan wrote: >>6. H.H The Jeeyar elaborated on the five incorrect views >> (pakshams )that define the five different mathams : >> >> A. Aathmaikya Paksham of Yaadhava Prakaasan >> B. Dhevathaikya Paksham , >> C. Thrimoorthy Saamya paksham >> D. Thrimoorthy Eikhya paksham >> E. Anyathra Isvarya paksham Dear Sri Anand Srinivasan : These 5 mathams are very important to understand in the context of the correctness of Sri VisishtAdhvaitham as proven by Swami Desikan in Tattva Muktha Kalaapa , Sarvaartha Siddhi ( a commentary on the latter ) and Srimath Rahasya Thraya Saaram . I will try to summarize them , although they are difficult Vedanthic concepts and will defy brief descriptions. A.Aathmaikya Paksham of Yaadhava Prakaasaa This system of philosophy is known as the BhEdhAbhEdha Vaadam and is attributed to BhaaskarA and Yaadhava PrakaasA . This is a powerful school of VedanthA at one time , as seen from the lengthy steps taken by Sudarsana Soori to refute the above darsanam following the lines of AchArya RaamAnujA's Sri Bhaashyam .BhEdhAbhEdham means literally ,identity in difference . The issue is related to how one can explain the material causality of Brahman ? For reference , a lump of clay is the material cause (upAdAna Kaaranam ) for an earthern pot .How does Brahman , which upanishads assert as immutable transform into the universe ? How is the material casuality of Brahman accounted for without affecting the svarUpam of Brahman ? BhaskarA and YaadhavaprakAsA accounted for this by stating that Brahman itself transforms into the material universe .This is generally recognized as BRAHMA -PARINAAMA -VAADHAM . VisishtAdhvaithins connected Brahman with chEthanam and AchEthanam ( sentient/chith and insentient/achith ) and held that the subtle form of assoication of Brahman with Chith and achith ( Sookshama -chith-achidh visishta form) is how one can explain the material causality of Brahman . This is a considered a modified form of BRAHMA-PARINAAMA- VAADHAM . Advaithins had the view based on the illusory nature of the universe .They held that Brahman is the basis of the illusory appearance of of the universe IS its material cause. Vedantha Desika classed this view as Vivartha Vaadham and dismissed both the Advaithin's and the YaadhavaprAkAsaa's views following the line of AchArya RaamAnujA and established the soundness of VisishtAdhvathic darsanam . In YaadhavaprakAsA's(YP's) matham , Brahman has three fold power (sakthi) and it transforms into chith , achith and Isvara sakthis.Brahman , which is being (sath) transforms itself into a triadic form , while maintaining its svarUpam unchanged although its sakthi undergoes transformation .In YP's matham , Brahman undergoing threefold changes (BhEdham )as Chethanam , Achethanam and Isvaran , while the svarUpam of Brahman remains unchanged (abEdham ).Swami Desikan rejects this view as unsound on the basis that acceptance of bhEdham and abEdham in one breath amounts to self-contradiction . This aathmaikyam ( the identity of aathmA/Paramaathma with prapancham (material universe ) is thus rejected . 2. dEvathaikya Paksham : This accepts that Brahman , ChEthanam and AchEthanam are distinctly different . But , it commits the blunder by holding the view that there is no difference between dEvAs like BrahmA , RudrA , Indran and ParamAthmA ( BhagavAn/Isvaran ). This point of view promulgates that the aathmA underlying all of them is one and the same .Since the same aathmA is present in the bodies of both BhagavAn and devathAs according to this view , it leads to the conclusion that there is no difference between the supreme God and the demi-Gods . Our SiddhAntham in distinct contrast recognizes limitless jeevans occupying limitless sarirams while our Lord shines as the antharyAmi of all these multitudinous Jeevans . Swami Desikan rejects this view as well . 3. ThrimUrthy Saamya paksham : This point of view overcomes the inherent limitation of the dEvathaikya paksham . It recognizes that the bodies of BrahmA-VishNu-Rudhran house different aathmAs .Those three aathmAs have the six auspicious attributes of Jn~Anam , Sakthi , Bhalam , Eisvaryam , Veeryam and Tejas in the same measure. These six attributes associated with the three aathmAs belonging to Brahma -VishNu-Rudhran are considered identical in value. There is no thAra Tamyam in these GuNams . They have saamyam or identical value among the thrimUrthys .This view recognizes that other DevAs like Agni , Indran will have less or more of each of the six guNAs , but not the thrimUrthys. Our siddhAntham based on Sruthis assert that Brahma and Rudran are karma vasyAs , who derive their origin/power from Sriman naarAyaNA and the Lord takes on the incarnation of VishNu from para VaasudEva Roopam . VishNu is not born like Rudran and BrahmA . Jeevans like BrahmA and Rudran are born because of their karmAs and that VishNu is not born , but is an avathAram of Sriman NaarAyaNA . 4. ThrimUrthy Eikhya paksham : Here ,a subtle change is made from the above ThrimUrthy Saamya Paksham . Here the sarirams of the thrimUrthys are recognized as different , but the same aathmA resides inside all the three. All the other devathAs would have aatham bhEdham , but not these three. When one takes into account pramANams such as " aadhyO NaarAyaNOdhEva:tasmaath BrahmA tathO Bhava:", it is hard to support either the ThrimUrth Eikhya or Saamya pakshams. The first and foremosrt Jagadh KaaraNam is Sriman naarAyaNan in our sampradhAyam and hence views 3 &4 are rejected .We believe in the PramANam : "AadhyO naarayaNa: deva: , ParO NaaraayaNa : deva: ( He is the first and ancient as well as the supreme devan : para devathai ). 5.Anyathra Eisvarya Paksham : This view is known as utthIrna vaadham . This view holds that VishNu because He is part of th trinity can not have jagath KaaraNathvam and hence there must be yet another ( anyathra Isvaran ) beyond the Trinity , who must have jagath kaaraNathvam . In this vaadham known also as VyOmAdhitha vaadham , VishNU's status as an incarnation of para Vaasudevan is deemphasized and He is lumped with BrahmA and Rudran. This view is therefore not acceptable to us based on PramANams once again . What is acceptable after rejecting the above five pakshams ? *********************************************************** The theme of the sixth chapter , ParadEvathA PaaramArthya adhikhAram deals at great length about this subject and establishes unambigously that Sriman NaarAyaNA is the Para dEvathai and that is the true status (paaramArthyam)among all gods.Swami says in the second half of the introductory slOkam of the sixth hapte rthat all the VedAs announce Sriman NaarAyaNA's supermacy in a united voice (Yekha kantam ) as well as Sage VyAsaa and other great ones : thrayyanthi : yEkha KaNtai: tadhanuguNamanu:VyAsamukhyOkthibhisccha What do they say ?They say clearly that Sriman NaarAyaNan is the supreme Lord to All and has the chEthanams and achEthanams as His body ; He is the one and only One , who can grant us Moksham and He is the One , who is enjoyed by the Muktha Jeevans : Sriman NaarAyaNO na: pathirakhila tanu: mukthidhO MukthabhOgya : Thus the refutation of the five points of view leaves us convinced that Sriman NaarAyaNan is para Tatthvam and He is the Sarva sEshi tous all and is our Supreme Swami .Manu Smruthi , MahA Bharatham , Sri VishNu PurANam provide us the PramANams to recognize Sriman NaarAyaNan as Jagadh KaaraNan and Para Tatthvam .SaraNAgathi at His sacred feet would yield without fail Moksham . H.H. The 45th Jeeyar of AhObila matam focused on the sixth chapter of Srimath Rahasya Thraya Saaram in his last UpanyAsam over the tele-bridge . NaarAyaNa , NaarAyaNa , NaarAyaNa ! Swami Desikan ThiruvadigaLE SaraNam Oppilaippan Koil VaradAchAri SadagOpan
- Next message: Martin Gansten: "Re: Ekadasi, panchangam questions"
- Previous message: Mani Varadarajan: "Ekadasi, panchangam questions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]