(no subject)
From the Bhakti List Archives
• February 2, 1996
Subject: Re: Comments on Rama Avathaar The following is forwarded from Nagu Satyan. Her email address is Nagu.Satyan@den.mmc.com Varadhan > COMMENTS RE SRI RAMA AVATHAAR > > Based on some articles I have read, I would like to offer the > following comments re Sri Rama Avathaar. Some of these incidents were > described in the Tamil magazine Gnyaana Bhoomi. > > 1. In one of the ongoing intensive battles between Asuras and Devas, > the Asuras were defeated very severely by the Devas. Sukracharya is > the Guru for Asuras. Sage Brigu's wife Bhoolomaa, Sukracharya's > mother, decided to help the Asuras and started doing a very harsh and > intense penance. The Devas were alarmed by the severity of the > penance and begged Lord Vishnu to come to their rescue. Lord Vishnu > intervenes and in a rage hurled the Sudarshanam disc at Brigu's wife > and beheaded her. When Brigu saw her knocked down dead, he was > saddened by the loss of his wife and cursed Lord Vishnu that He > (Vishnu) would be born as a human being and suffer the pain and sorrow > of being separated from His wife. With the prowess of his divine > strength, Sage Brigu revived his wife back to life. Because of Sage > Brigu's curse, Vishnu was born as Rama, son of Dasaratha and suffered > from the separation of his wife Seetha. > > Comment-- At the outset it appears incredible that Vishnu was the > recipient of a curse from anybody. He did not have to accept Sage > Brigu's curse nor did He as Rama have to endure the various pain and > sufferings. However, I believe Vishnu 's intentions was to show His > people that no one is above the rules of conduct, including Him, and > all of us have to face our destiny. To enforce the Dharma, Lord > Vishnu proved this point by using Himself as the subject/object. > > Vishnu as Krishna Avathaar also was the recipient of a harsh curse > from Ghandhaari. At the end of the Kurukshethra war, Ghandhaari is in > tremendous pain and sorrow after having lost all her sons. When Lord > Krishna visits her to offer his condolences, her pain reveals as anger > and she curses him that the whole Yadhava clan would perish. The > tragic way the Yadhavas are destroyed is unbelievable, even with > Krishna born into that clan. Again, Vishnu as Krishna accepts and > endures the curse to demonstrate that even He is bound by the rules of > conduct. > > 2) Some of Rama's actions are indeed contrary to His nature. One of > these actions is the method He resorts to kill Vali. Without even > addressing here whether Vali deserved this treatment, we can discuss > the fact that Rama recognizes that the method he resorted to kill Vali > from behind the tree is not acceptable neither as a kshaththriya nor > as a Avathaar. The difference between Rama Avathaar and Krishna > Avathaar is that in Dvaapara Yuga Krishna believed that means > justified the end, whereas in Rama's time because Dharma was still > prevalent Rama did not believe in the means. He gives Vali the boon > that in the next birth Vali would be the cause of the end of Rama's > (Vishnu's) Avathaar, which happened in Dvaapara Yuga when Krishna was > killed by a hunter (Vali) who mistakes the toe of Krishna to be the > animal. There is a saying in Tamil " Raaman kaatiya paadai, Krishnan > koduttha Geethai" and "Krishnan saidadai saiyaadE, Krishnan sonnadai > sai." > > 3) Lord Vishnu and The Avathaars are eternal. Each Avathaars role is > determined and shines in the predetermined era. However, the > Avathaars resurface at the appropriate time. When Lord Narayana took > Sri Rama avathaar to protect the Devas from Ravana, Lord Adisesha was > born as his younger brother Lakshmana. Lakshmana spent his whole life > selflessly serving Rama with utmost love and devotion. When Rama > observed that Lakshmana was fully engrossed in serving Sri Rama > without thinking about his needs, Rama had a yearning to be born as > Adisesha's younger brother to serve him. Accordingly, in the Dvaapara > Yuga, Lakshmana was born as the older brother Balarama and Rama as > younger brother Krishna. It appears that Rama (Krishna) was not fully > satisfied that he had served Adisesha (Balarama). Rama was waiting > for another opportunity to be born to serve Adisesha. In Kali Yuga, > Sri Ramanujacharya came to earth as Adisesha's manifestation. Sri > Rama waited for the opportune time and manifested as Daasarathy > (Mudaliaandaan, nephew and disciple of Sri Ramanujacharya), devoted > student of Sri Ramanujacharya and served him to fulfill Rama's desires > in Thraita Yuga. > > 4) As Rama, Vishnu did not use His divine strength to overcome > obstacles, unlike in Krishna avathaar where He had to resort to many > tricks to uphold Dharma. Krishna would now and then reveal to others > that He was none other than Srimad Narayana. There are two specific > instances that I know where Rama's divine form was revealed in that > Yuga, and once He appeared as Rama Avathaar in Kali Yuga for > Thirumangai Azhwar. The first instance is at Seetha swayamvaram, when > an enraged Parasurama appears at the court after he sees through his > divine eyes that the bow has been broken. When angry Parasurama > confronts Rama, Rama reveals that He is none other than Lord Narayana, > and Parasurama recognizes the end of his role in the era. (There is a > marked difference in end of Avathaar versus end of role. Parasurama > is one of the seven Chiranjeevis and is immortal.) The second > instance occurs in the forest when Rama is searching for Seetha who > has been kidnapped by Ravana. Along the way Rama comes across Jatayu > in Thiruppullam Poothangudi (Tamil Naadu) who is waiting for Rama to > inform him about seeing Seetha being taken to Lanka. After Jatayu > dies, Rama prepares for performing the last rites. However, shastra > required that Seetha be next to Rama during the religious rites. When > Rama was pondering about this situation, Bhoomi Devi (Lakshmi Piraatti) > appeared from the nearby pushkaranee (pond) on a red lotus and > requested that Rama perform the rites with her in place of Seetha. > Accordingly, Rama fulfilled his duties to Jatayu and being tired slept > under a tree in sayana kolam. In the same spot a temple was built for > Rama. The original version of moolavar is Rama in sayana yogam, with > the bow in his left hand on seven-head Adisesha, with Bhoomi Devi at > the feet, and Lakshmana and Jatayu close to Him at the back. After > the incident with Thirumangai Azhwar when Rama provides dharshanam to > him, the moolavar permanently became Rama in sleeping posture with > four arms carrying conch, disc, bow and arrow. > > Comments re Moolavar-- Sri Rama revealed his divinity in Kali Yuga to > Thirumangai Azhwar. After Srimad Narayana and Lakshmi appeared as a > newly married couple to save Thirumangai Azhwar from committing theft, > he was touched by the fact that the Lord was preventing him from > continuing the robbery and traveled to visit the divya sthalams and > reached the place called Thiruppullam Poothangudi. When he visited > the temple he saw the moolavar with a bow in one of his hands and > thought "what is this pose with a kshaththriya lying down with a bow? > " and turned back without offering his respect. He had just > approached the Dwajasthambam when he become faint and lost his vision. > In this state of not being able to see his way, he briefly turned > towards the moolavar. There to his surprise he saw Sri Rama's > darshanam in the sleeping posture with four arms carrying conch, disc, > bow and arrow. Thirumangai Azhwar blessed by this divya darshanam > repented for his action and recited the following pasuram: > > " arividhariyaan anaiththulagumudaiyaan ennaiyaaludaiyaan > kuriyamaaniyuruvaai chootthan manniyamarumidam > nariyamalarmEl surampaarkka yayilaar manjai nadamaada > porikol siraivandu esaipaadum pullum poothangudi thaanE! > > Since that event with Thirumangai Azhwar, Sri Rama has been providing > dharshan to the devotees in this form, with four arms carrying conch, > disc, and bow. >
- Next message: Vijay Srinivasan: "Re: Celebration of Ramanuja Jayanthi"
- Previous message: Sampath Rengarajan: "Re: Proposal for Sri Ahobila Muth complimentary to SVTK"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]