Re: hindu philosophy of conduct: Prof M.Rangacharya
From the Bhakti List Archives
• February 27, 1995
I did read some portions of intial verses of 7th chapter. I feel he is very good and a true visistadvaitin. but like most pre-independence writers, writes questionably when comparing to other religions . HIs one paragraph on page 12 , vol II sort of bothered me - All great inspired religions in the world bear testimony to their faith in God, whatever may be the way and means that made their God vision an accomplished fact to them. We may take Sri-Krishna, Moses, Jesus and Mohammed as notable examples to illustrate this point; and an appreciative and impartial study of their lives and teachings cannot fail to show to us that none of them had any doubts or uncertainty or suspicion of incompleteness in relation to his knowledge of God. In the case of all great seers, their knowledge of God is direct and therefore, both full and undoubted. ___________________ Here Sri-Krishna is referred to as a seer and world-teacher and a seeker of God. This aspect is totally unacceptable to Sri Ramanujacharya and to even the words of Bhagawadgita itself!. Ramajujacharya's introduction to Gitabhasya identifies Sri Krishna with the absolute God undoubtedly. Moreover, no where in the whole of bhagawadgita, Lord krishna has ever referred to himself as just a seer! and a seeker of God! . Sri Krishna is probably only character among all the religions in the world, who has blatantly identified himself with the absolute God all over his teachings in Bhagawadgita. According to Lord Krishna, He never underwent the process of perfection and became God but always was GOD all the time....never was different and never will be! To my knowledge none of the prophets - Jesus, Moses, Mohammed identified themselves with God, but were God seekers. Atleast according to the original verses of Gita, bible, Qoran, this statement of Rangacharya seems questionable. Probably one has to ignore this since in other places his explanation of some verse are EXCELLENT. Also we have to give credence to the times since he was in, pre- independence era where there was certain discretion maintained regarding christianity etc. (to the extent of untrue representation). Krishna
- Next message: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: hindu philosophy of conduct: Prof M.Rangacharya"
- Previous message: Parthasarati Dileepan: "maadhuryam"
- Maybe in reply to: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: hindu philosophy of conduct: Prof M.Rangacharya"
- Next in thread: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: hindu philosophy of conduct: Prof M.Rangacharya"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]