Re: Seeming Contradiction
From the Bhakti List Archives
• February 7, 2000
Dear Sri Ramakrishnan, > Our religion is one which allows a lot of individualism in approach >to the Lord and in the method of worship. In fact, to my knowledge, >there is no mandatory worship at all in the religion. Any method of >worship that is there, was given only as a suggestion and there is >always your own way of worshipping or considering the Lord. This, in my opinion, is a generalization based on a corrupted view of the Advaitic traditions, which basically ended up pushing the idea of individualism. I do not want to go into the debate on why I feel so, here. However, in Vaishnava traditions, be it Sri Vaishnava or other branches of Vaishnavam, temple worship is very important. The very fact that all 11 out of 12 alwars performed mangalaasaasanam at various temples is a standing example of the importance of worship and saranagathi. > However, in our Vaishnava sampradayam, the role of the Acharyan is >one of a guide to Lord. There is a no contradiction here. But going a >bit further, our sampradayam says that the Acharyan is the ONLY way to >His feet. There, in my view, comes the contradiction. How can there be a >total dependency on another person's advice in a religion that >emphasises so much individualism? > Again, here I believe you are mixing the two traditions (viz, advaitic and visitadvaitic). That said, YOU DO NEED AN ACHARYA for the advaitic tradition too, to understand how the individual realization (jivan-mukti) can be attained. The distinction is in the word ONLY. we give more importance to the Acharya, who has the responsibility to deliver the sishya to the Lord (saranagathi). However, this is not a must with the other system, which gives importance to Gnyana yoga and depends totally on the individual. So the effort by the acharya in such a tradition is limited. In our Sampradhayam, we believe that Lord has some qualities and with the acharya's blessings (and his prapatti on behalf of the Sishya) one can get moksham. there are many works that address this: PVP's Manikka maalai, Pillai Lokacharyas Artha panchakam, etc. These discuss the relationship between the Lord and the jiva and how an acharya can make a difference. the bottom line is the concept of saranagati that differentiates between our tradition and the rest. Adiyen Venkatesh K. Elayavalli Cypress Semiconductor Data Communications Division 3901 N. First St. MS 4 Phone: (408) 456 1858 San Jose CA 95134 Fax: (408) 943 2949 email: elayavalli@hotmail.com (external) Home Page Location: http://www.srivaishnava.org ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
- Next message: L&T-ECCG-Buildings & Factories: "re:abhivaadhanam"
- Previous message: narayanan.k.m_at_in.pwcglobal.com: "Mumookshapadi -Thirumantra Prakaranam Part-XII"
- Maybe in reply to: Ramakrishnan Kazhiyur-Mannar: "Seeming Contradiction"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]