Re: Oblivious to the nature of reality
From the Bhakti List Archives
• December 1, 1999
Dear Bhagavatas, namO nArAyaNA. Questions: How do we maintain and sharpen our focus on the ultimate goal and nature of reality and bring about internal peace (minimize the cyclical pattern of ups and downs)? How do we keep the search for brahmajnana (knowledge of that which is eternal) from beoming like searching for a needle in a hay stack? Knowledge is a substance (dravya) that can take on infinitely many states. These states (modifications) are brought about by contact with external objects, both sentient and non-sentient, through the manas and senses. Unless we use our free will to channel this dravya (knowledge) in the right direction we will continue to be dominated by the tendencies (vasanas) that pull our focus towards the samsaric reality and away from the ultimate reality. Without focus, the search for brahmajnana (knowledge of that which is eternal) will be like searching for a needle in a hay stack (keep in mind knowledge can take on infinitely many states not all these states are of interest to one who wants the ultimate fruit and not transitory fruits.) Due to a superficial thought process and haughtiness, most of us who are born with the advantage of having a greater inclination towards the truth expounded in the Vedas, do not make avail of the opportunity. Why do we Lose focus? Some thoughts 1. Our line of work does not bring us into contact with substances that increase the likelihood of modifications that result in an expansion of knowledge of that which is eternal. In fact in most case it brings us into contact with objects that result in contraction of knowledge of that which is eternal. Our line of work is against that prescribed in the dharma sastras. 2. In our social interactions we associate with all sorts of individuals, nihilists, atheists, agnostics, pseudo-vedantins, and so on. All such interactions are not necessarily bad; however, in general these interactions are capable of furthering our own delusion. 3. In our education, we are exposed to many theories that are in stark contradiction to the Vedantic conception of the nature of reality. We sometimes go about reconciling all these bounded theories within the Vedantic framework even when it is not possible. Note: I used brahmajnana to denote knowledge of that which is eternal please correct me If I am using the term improperly. ramanuja dasan, Venkat krishNArpaNam (Venkat Nagarajan) Toronto
- Next message: Sampath Rengarajan: "thiru adhyayana sEvai - part 14 - thEyAtha vennilAvin puthu uthayam !"
- Previous message: Krishna Kalale: "RE: Srimad Bhagavat Gita"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]