A note of caution
From the Bhakti List Archives
• December 14, 1998
Dear Members, I have been advised by a concerned individual that some Bhakti List members take my statements on matters of Sri Vaishnava history and philosophy as unquestionably authoritative. I hope this is not the case! If, however, this is true, I hasten to clarify that my writing in no way qualifies for such respect. I am just like all of you, another member of this list, who seeks to share his opinions with fellow bhaktas. I am certainly prone to error, and I have nowhere near the learning of the many vidvAns and swamis who reside in India, living devout lifestyles 24 hours a day. I like the warning on the Thondarkulam Web [*] page, which is 100% applicable to me: The information that I present (and that pretty much all Bhakti members present) is for informal reading and appreciation of Sri Vaishnavam only. They are NOT authentic statements made by an acharya. Most of what I write is collected by myself from traditional literature and upanyAsams from acharyas, supplanted with my own feelings and opinions, so I have done no original research in these matters. I have not had the benefit of sitting at the feet of the acharyas for long periods of time and learning from them. Please do keep this in mind while reading anything I write. Thanking you, thirukkacci nambi daasan Mani [*] http://www.geocities.com/~thondarkulam
- Next message: Anand Karalapakkam: "Re: rAmAnujar and the gopuram episode"
- Previous message: Srinath Chakravarty: "Re: Gotram question by Balaraman M. Sriram"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]