rAmAnujar and the gopuram episode
From the Bhakti List Archives
• December 13, 1998
SrI: SrImatE SrI Lakshminrusimha ParabrahmanE namaha Dear devotees, namO nArAyaNA. adiyEn is forwarding a posting by a bhAgavathA in another list , with his permission. adiyEn rAmAnuja dAsan ananthapadmanAbha dAsan krishNArpaNam ---------------------------------------------------- Sri Ramanuja’s life history is filled with extraordinary events. Paraphrasing Einstein on Mahatma Gandhi, it is almost unbelievable that such a one walked this earth in flesh and blood about 1,000 years ago. Among these events the most emotional one is the incidence that gave him the name “Emperumaanaar”. The skeletal details of the event are well known. However, there are some important misunderstandings. The most important of these is whether or not Sri Ramanuja went up the temple Gopuram and preached the Rahasyas and Rahasyarthas to everyone. Research on such matters is of no importance to a Bhagavtha who is completely immersed in the Kalyana Gunas of our Lord. However, since adiyEn is not at that level of maturity my curiosity got the better of me. AdiyEn looked into four publications. They are: [1] Acharya Vaibhavam by Sri. U. vE. Purisai Nadathur Krishnamachariyar Swami, published by Sri Visishtadvaita Research Centre, 66 Dr. Rangachari Road, Madras 18. (1992) [2] Sri Ramanujar by Pi. Sri, published by Sudesamithran, (1964) (Out of print) [3] Ramanuja Vaibhavam by Vadivazhagiya nambidasar with Commentary by Sri R. Kannan Swamy, published by Sri Villiputhoor R. Kannan Swamy, 91 Thulasingam Mudali Street, Madras 11 (Original 300 to 400 years ago, commentary 1988) [4] Araayirappadi Guruparampara vaibhavam by Pinbazhagiya PerumaaL Jeeyar (a sishya of NampiLLai), published by Puththoor Swamy, (The oldest account of Guruparampara, 1968 print) Before we examine the written evidences, let us examine the scene of the event. First, going up the temple Gopuram and looking down from the top is an intense emotional experience. The watchman who took us up narrated the story with so much emotion that it was impossible to keep the tears in check. There are two moorthy’s for Emparumaanar, in seated position, at the top of the Gopuram looking down into the street. The watchman also narrated how pilgrims from Andhra would hug these moorthees and weep. Such untinted devotion towards our Ramanuja is indeed inspiring. Then we notice a few things. First, ThirukkOshitiyur Nambi’s thirumaaLigai is just a few steps from the bottom of the Gopuram. Would Sri Ramanuja have violated the promise he made to his Acharyan in such a brazen way right in front of his own house? May be , may be not, this is perhaps arguable. But, the second thing we notice is that the day when this event is supposed to have happened was the day of TheRkaazhvaan (Lord Nrisimha) utsavam. On that day the place in front of the temple Gopuram must have been crawling with people, young and old, men and women, children running around, vendors hawking their wares, etc, etc. There must have been a carnival atmosphere. Would our Paramacharyan have chosen such a time and place to openly impart the most esoteric of manthras to even the uninterested and incompetent? How many people would have really understood the significance of this? Lastly, from a real practical point of view, there is simply no way that Sri Ramanuja would have been heard down below in the streets even if he was shouting at the top of his voice from high above on top of the Gopuram. Now, let us turn to the textual evidence. First, the most recent of these is Sri Purisai Swami’s book [1] published by Sri Ahobila Mutham. Here the Swami says, even though Sri Ramanuja went to Thirukkoshtiyur along with Koorathazhvaan, Mudaliandan, and Nadadurazhvan, he approached Nambikal by himself and received the upadesam. Then, the next day, the day of TheRkazhvan utsavam, Sri Ramanuja conveyed the upadesams to Koortahaazvaan and others. NambikaL was irked by this and ordered that Ramanuja be brought in front of him. The rest of the story follows along the well known lines. The significance of this is the ease with which Sri Ramanuja passed on the upadesam. Even at the risk of the esoteric meanings getting lost for ever, NambikaL put Sri Ramanuja through severe tests before imparting them to him. Further, Nambikal passed it on only to one disciple. However, Sri Ramanuja, out of his limitless compassion, did not subject his pupils to any grueling tests. This opened the way for everyone to learn the manthras with ease. This is the real significance of the event. Now let us move to the second text by Pi. Sri. Here, Pi. Sri. says that Sri Ramanauja approached Nambikal along with Koorathaazhvaan (K) and Mudaliandan (M). When Nambikal objected to the presence of K and M, Sri Ramanuja answered that M is his Thridandam and K is his Pavithram. NambikaL was pleased and taught the manthras and the meaning to all three. Then, the next day, on the day of Therkaazhvaan utsavam, Pi. Sri. says, Udayavar conveyed the esoteric manthraas as well as the hidden meaning to everyone present, including women and children. Pi. Sri. then adds that “some say he went up the gopuram”. Here is the original: “gOpuraththil ERi ninRu ivar thirumanthiraththaiyum, athan poruLaiyum muzhanginaar enRu *** kooRuvOrum uNdu ***.” The phrase “kooRuvOrum uNdu”, i.e. there are people who claim this, clearly shows that Pi. Sri. Was hedging about the gopuram incidence. Now, to the remaining two references [3] and [4]. Of these, Sri Ramanuja Vaibhavam [3] is dated approximately 300 to 400 years ago. Sri R. Kannan Swamy, the commentator, argues that the author, Vadivazhagiya Nambi is a disciple of Azhakappa Nambi. This means the author must have belonged to ThenAcharya sampradayam. According to this text, Udayavar does introduce M and K as his Thandu and Pavithram. But, the upadesam itself is supposed to have been given in the ear of Udayavar. Here is the relevant portion of the verse #341: ... nambi oppilaar seviyil andha uNmaiyai upadEsiththaan.” (Nambi gave the upadesam about the truth in the ear of the peerless Ramanuja.) >From this we can infer that the Upadesam was given only to Ramanuja, but not to others. The text then continues that Sri Ramanuja stayed in Thirukkoshityur for a few days. Then, on the day of Therkaazhvaan utsavam, Sri Ramanauja openly gave out the upadesam. Here is that part of verse #356: “.... anaivarum aRiyum vaNNam seppinaar iLaiyaazhvaar ...” (Ramanuja explained the meaning so that everyone could hear.) There is no mention of Gopuram here or Ramanuja giving upadesam specially to M or K. But, since [3] follows [4] quite closely, we can infer that by “anaivarum” (all) what is actually meant is the group of Sri Vaishnavas present with Sri Ramanuja. Finally, let us look at the oldest of all these texts, ARAyirappadi [4]. The Thandu-Pavithram part of the story is mentioned here, which is repeated in much the same way in [3] above. But, in this text Nambikal gives permission for Udayavar to instruct K and M on the esoteric manthras. Here is the original: “... ivvartthatthai ivargaLukku oziya maRRoruvarukkum sollaathE k0LLum ...” (Do not explain these meanings to anyone other than these (two).) >From this it is clear that Nambikal gave upadesam only to Ramanuja, but not to K and M. Then, the text goes on, the next day was Therkaazvaar utsavam. On this day Sri Ramanuja gave upadesam to many Sri Vaishnavas. Here is the original: “... therkaazvaar thiruvOlakkaththil anEgam srivaishNavarkaLLukku ap prama rahasya arththatthai aruLinaar.” Note the term, “anEgam Sri VaishnavavargaLukku”. Nambikal allowed Ramanuja to pass on the upadesam only to K and M. But Udaiyavar gave it away to many Sri Vaishnavas. That is all. There is no mention of upadesams to everyone including women and children as Pi. Sri states. And, there is no mention of any Gopuram. The Gopuram episode is just interesting addition to popular folklore full of emotional anubhavam, but not much in the way of fact. Summary ------- Did Sri Ramanuja climb to the top of the Gopuram? [1], [3] and [4] do not mention this at all. Even Pi Sri in [2] hedges by saying some people claim this. So we can authoritatively conclude that Sri Ramanuja did not climb on top of any Gopuram. Did Sri Ramanuja give out rahasya manthras/mantharthas to everyone? Only Pi. Sri. states this happened. ARAyirappadi clearly states that this was given only to "anEga" "Sri Vaishnavas." Thus there is no justification to claim that Sri Ramanuja freely gave it to anyone walking in, let alone anyone standing in a street corner. It seems some people claim that "Sri Vaishnavas" means anyone coming in and "anEga" means a mass of people. Such broad interpretations of these terms are speculations and cannot be presented or accepted as facts. Those who continue to claim such broad interpretations are well advised to look at the way in which Kooraththaazhvan and Mudaliandan got Charamasloartham. All said and done, none of these diminish the significance of what actually took place almost 1,000 years ago. But for Sri Ramanuja’s perseverance to get the upadesam from NambikaL and then the ease with which he passed it along to many of his sishyas, we may not have the prapatti margam today. It is for this reason that Udayavar is indeed Emperumaanar. =============
- Next message: Madhavkkannan, Vasudevan: "RE: A new ambition"
- Previous message: sudarshan: "Musings on Sita's "agni-pravEsam" #12"
- Next in thread: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: rAmAnujar and the gopuram episode"
- Maybe reply: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: rAmAnujar and the gopuram episode"
- Maybe reply: Anand Karalapakkam: "Re: rAmAnujar and the gopuram episode"
- Maybe reply: Anand Karalapakkam: "Re:rAmAnujar and the gopuram episode"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]