Sanskrit and Tamil
From the Bhakti List Archives
• December 31, 1997
This topic is not directly related to "Bhakthi". However, due to the special status given to Tamil by Sri Vaishnavas, IMHO, it is an important topic for all Sri Vaishnavas. During one of the private discussions it was mentioned that Sanskrit is the mother of all languages (at least the Indian languages). Further, during the discussion that ensued, it was mentioned that Tamil borrowed lot of words from Sanskrit; that Sanskrit is older than Tamil; that Sanskrit's grammatical structure is superior, etc. Some "facts" offered as corroborating evidence include, Sanskrit is the language of Vedas and Vedas existed when only the Lord was present; Nithyasoories praise the lord in Vaikuntam in Sanskrit; Tamil lacks letters such as kha, gha, bha, etc; Sanskrit is older than Tamil and thus it is obvious that Tamil borrowed from Sanskrit; etc. The following is a summary of the position that was presented. I am interested in finding more information about these points from those who have "hard" information. 1. Sanskrit did not borrow anything from Tamil. 2. Even though not to the extent of other South Indian languages, Tamil did borrow a lot from Sanskrit. 3. Sanskrit is older than Tamil. 4. The grammar structure of Sanskrit is superior. -- adiyEn
- Next message: V. Sadagopan: "Saathvika ThyAgam"
- Previous message: Parthasarati Dileepan: "Colorado Conference"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]