Re: Traditional dates vs scientific dates
From the Bhakti List Archives
• December 15, 1995
On Dec 15, 5:32am, Jaganath.Bharadwaj@nrecatao.nreca.org wrote: > Here is an extract from a letter written by the then Asthana Vidvan > of Sri Ahobila Mutt to the English/Telegu editors of Nrsimha Priya > under the instructions of the then Jeer appointee Srivan Satakopa Sri > Narayana Yateendra Mahadesikar. " ... His successors all carried > His mantle with great distinction and divinity and have been shining > as Muktas."... I do not wish to belabor this point, but it appears that the AsthAna vidvAn is referring to the fact that the jIyars are shining as muktas now because they have passed on from this earth. There is no way in Visishtadvaita that a mukta can still be embodied on Earth. It makes no sense in our conception of reality. > Per the > English translation of Vedanta Desikars works a Mukta is one who > serves Sriman Narayana "at all times, in all places and under all > circumstances and who looks upon this world as Narayana's weapons and > ornaments." I am not familiar with this definition. May I ask in which work he writes this? The ubhaya vibhuti of the Lord are the nitya vibhuti and lila vibhuti. The former is spoken of in the Vedas as ``tad vishnoh paramam padam sadaa paSyanti sUrayah'', and is experienced by the nitya suris and those who have achieved moksha. The lila vibhuti is includes this earth and is experienced by people like us in samsaara. Mani
- Next message: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: Christian Time line -kali Yuga agreement"
- Previous message: Jaganath.Bharadwaj_at_nrecatao.nreca.org: "Re: Traditional dates vs scienti"
- Next in thread: Jaganath.Bharadwaj_at_nrecatao.nreca.org: "Re: Traditional dates vs scientific dates"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]