Re: Traditional dates vs scienti
From the Bhakti List Archives
• December 15, 1995
On Dec 15, 10:06am, Jaganath.Bharadwaj@nrecatao.nreca.org wrote: > At least > for the followers of Sri Ahobila Mutt, the Jeer is a Mukta Purusha With no disrespect intended, I would humbly like to point out that calling any person on Earth other than God a ``mukta purusha'' is in complete violation of Visishtadvaita philosophy. No doubt the sannyasis of Ahobila Matham are great acharyas and scholars and deserve to honored as such; however, jIvanmukti is explicitly denied by Sri Vaishnava acharyas beginning with Ramanuja. The Jiyar may be considered an exalted being and worshipped as one would worship God Himself; however, there is no doubt that the Jiyar is not a mukta. Once again, with no disrespect intended, I am nearly certain that the Jiyar himself would say that he is not a mukta. Mani
- Next message: Jaganath.Bharadwaj_at_nrecatao.nreca.org: "Re: Traditional dates vs scienti"
- Previous message: Vijay Srinivasan: "Tualasi plants : To whomsoever it may Concern"
- Next in thread: Jaganath.Bharadwaj_at_nrecatao.nreca.org: "Re: Traditional dates vs scienti"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]