Re: [No Subject]
From the Bhakti List Archives
• December 11, 1995
skaushik@MIT.EDU wrote: > > This "section of Sri Vaishanavas" could also be viewed as including > Sri Vedanta Desikar himself. In Rahasya Traya Sara, he clearly > argues why even the most devout non-Brahmin bhaktas can nver > "become" Brahmins. He argues that the para-Bhaktas ought to > be respected, but they cannot and should not be considered as Brahmins. > He argues both from teh viewpoint of scriptures as well as > "practicality" (importance of maintaining social order). > The samAsrayanam is more for equalization in the eyes of the lord, but not at the exclusion of duties required of a brahmin and so the sacred thread was still relavant. The impact of the reverence paid to lower caste alwars was probably dramtic enough to suggest that Sri Ramanuja was not merely trying to do a toned down change . Therefore, you are probably right in that the functions of the brahmins was considered to be necessary, as the maintenance of knowledge, customs and attitudes would otherwise be difficult if not impossible. There are statments made that suggest that the greatness of a few alwars of a lower caste should not be taken as suggesting that there was ample qualification all around to disband the social order. On the other hand there is also a notion of artha brahmana and so the responsibility of the brahmin to be weary of becoming complacent and arrogant. Is it not possibly to say that social order has not a heirarchical interpretation but a functional one. > >From a "naive" reading of our scriptures, it seems to me that > though the scriptures speak of EQUAL accessibility of God to all members > of society, it NOT imply that the MODES of which God can be attained are > the same for all members. Though our 21rst century ideals may wish > otherwise, many of the most eminent Sri Vaishnava scholars in history > have not believed in an egalitarian society of the sort that people > wish today. > In todays society, the temperment of individuals who likely involve themselves in temple afairs and shastras for the most part within the brahmin groups suggesting that it might require generations of involvement to build an inherent attachement to such affairs. How do we change with times, how do we rekon with outside forces, how do we extrapolate our beloved teachings to the current times ? Mohana ^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v ^v Trust your gut feelings, for gut cells have not developed ^v ^v enough to doubt themselves ... Dr. Deepak Chopra ^v ^v ^v ^v Mohana K. Ramanujam Software Consultant ^v ^v Schlumberger Technologies Voice: (408)437-5225 ^v ^v Automatic Test Systems Division Fax: (408)437-5246 ^v ^v 1601 Technology Drive E-mail: mohana@san-jose.ate.slb.com^v ^v San Jose, CA 95110 Home Telephone:(408)736-3271 ^v ^v Home Address: 620 Iris. Ave, ^v ^v #427, Sunnyvale, ^v ^v CA 94086 ^v ^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v
- Next message: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: Mani's poignant argument"
- Previous message: Mani Varadarajan: "Missed post: Bhagavad Dhyaana Sopanam"
- In reply to: skaushik_at_MIT.EDU: "(no subject)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]