thirup paanaazhwaar and "pranavak krithi"
From the Bhakti List Archives
• December 11, 1995
Thanks to Mr.PD for bringing this up again. Thanks to Mr. Sadagopan for his excellant references and commentary on Swami Desikan's "bagwath dyaana sObaanam". I have written a small thamizh sinthanai "a thought in Tamil" (part 1) on bagwath bakthi and love for God. I have also presented some views (part 2) based on a very primitive analysis. Part 1 **********Thetamil introduction starts********************** oru sinthanai thodarum athan aRimukamum saamanthi poo malarvathaRkku thEthi irukkiRathu malligai poovukkum jaathi irukkiRathu vanamaali en maalavaN meL varum kaathal poo malara thEthiyum paarppathillai, jaathiyum paarppathillai. aanmaavil uthithu ithayithil thoYththu kaNkaLil mudinthaal athu bakthi para vasak kaNNeer KaNNanaik kanda kaNkaLil arrambiththu ithayaththai ooduruvi en annmaavil aikkiyamaanaal athu para bakthiyaam kaathal ik kaathal varumaayin aan pen maRRum anthasthu pEtham kooda paarppathillai. adiyaar onRE, athan piNaippu. aandavan sEvai mattumE athan ilakku. maalavan "maayai"yaam kauviri pOl ik kaathalum than kaRaikalai thaanE ittukk koLkinRana. kaalakaalamaaka odik koNdirukkum iv vadiyaarkaLin kaathal veLLaththil itho innum iru thuLikaL. "a malaanaathipiraan thantha adikalE pORRi, u yar thiru thamizh maRai chaarum thantha uththama muniyE pORRi, m aRaiththu MaRai porul thantha, maraa thirup pugazh - sEr paanaazhwaar thiruvadikaE pORRi Sampath Rengarajan ******************Tamil introduction ends************************* Part 2 There were two versions of loka saaranga muni's revealtions on aazhwaar accounted so far. And there was an excellant commentary and references on "bagwath dyaana sObaanam" and the "basis" on thirup paanaazhwaar's "amalanaathi piraan" presented earlier here. I wanted to go deeper and analyse into the notion of Swami Desikan. Swami Desikan empahsised that these ten songs has the esssence of "thamizh maRai" (4000), and hence the essence of all the vedas, or contain the essense of all the vedaanthaarthangaL. Though I donot claim authorship or merit for this primitive research of mine, I feel that the causes of all causes Lord Arangan is the soul reason for this. I welcome any comments from all bakthaas of this group. Swami Desikan implied that amalanaathi piraan completely summarises the inner meaning of tamizh maRai. There are citations that when bramhaa was created from achuthan's novel, subsequently the rudraas, and gayathri mantram were coming out of his Face. For someone rational, birth from umblical chord is meaningful (bramhaa) but the creation of others from face may not be agreed for rationality. But there are clues to support the "content" that HIS thirumEni "contains" EVERYTHING and EVERYONE at the end of each cycle or pralayaa. And THIS IS THAT particular thirumEni that the aazhwaar sees in "Aranga raajan". In paadhuha sahasram in Desikap prabandam the reference to the other contribution of one other part of the thirumEni is provided ie His divine lotus feet and the "unfolding content" was "Ganges" during the instant of tiruvikrama avathaaram. Quantifying the lord with "physical" interpretation is meaningful to those who knows what are present in HIM. But for others they may question the validity of the arguement that the 10 songs on the Lords thirumEni ([gross anatomy], forgive me for this word. This is presented here only for the understanding of the unknown and rational readers) alone represents the essence of thamizh maRai. There are several references to maahalukshmi residing in his thiru maarbu or "chest". I wanna recall a personal experience and share it with the group. During the iraappaththu festival as a member of the ubayak kaaraas I had the privileage to touch and worship the thiruvangi, (his dress) abayahastham, and thirup paathukai that nammperumaan wears (uthsavar) and also the kavachams that were the aabaranams for the Lord Arangan himself (moolavar). The pachchaik kal or known as maragathak kal that is in the center of the kavacham for HIS chest is supposed to have the indentations inside it as "mahaalakshmi". We were told that this is visible only to those who are qualified souls. When few of us reported they didnot see anything, few of us did see the thiruvuruvam of Sri Mahaalakshmi carved in the stone. The thiru aabaranams are not offered for special darshan of anyone anymore since last 10 years or so. One can conclude that describing the creation, preservation and destruction of the universe, everything in it and every soul that dwells in it, will truly represent the "Life Science". Based on some fumdamental belief and in the line of our philoposhy, If we talk about the process of physical creation of the universe, and the existance of various medium, maintenance of this order by various faculties and destruction and the "start all over again" cycle, it will represent the true nature of life science, all holy books that talk about it and all scientific theories that were invented, to be invented, unfolding to be unfolded etc.. While Such rational science is by itself dis"covering" many new facts, one should view the two other "creations (rudraas etc, and ganges) or unfolding contents at the start" listed above and one would also take into account some other references from 4000. There are references to "uNdu umizhntha thEvarkal" and "echchil thEvarkaL" in the Tamizh maRai implying that HE contained or swallowed all the demigods in Himself and unfolded or created them at the start of every cycle. But he alone existed for ever. There are so many references that Ezhisai or 7 musics, (also 7 worlds and 7 seas 7 mountains) and aaru angams or six vedangams, (also six gunaas), five boodams or elements , 4 vedass, three lords, and the two (divine couple) are all concluded in one syllabal ("pranavam" ie the concept of amalnaathi piraan) (the modern theory of the universe being condensed into dense sound material and unfolding from that, may find support from this) and that the cycle unfolds and folds again as shown in several paasurams in 4000. The research points to the fact that in each shektram the lord is in one form or another. In arangam, he is in the form of the "pranavam" and his mode is the "creator of pranavam" itself. ie "pranavak krithi". "pranava" by virtue of containing everything in itslef at the time of unfolding and folding, is the cause of everything. At some point when the cycle is not even started or between the end and start, the "pranavaa" itself was contained and unfolded or created by this Lord Arangan who is the "pranavak krithi". Hence HE is the causes of all causes. Amalannathi piraan's reference to this implied meaning makes it the "container of all maRai" and thus amalanaathi piraan might have been viewed by Swami Desikan as the essence of all essences. As Arangan, He not only condensed everything to one sound syllable or "oR ezhuththu" but also HE CONTAINED them all in his mouth as Lord Krishna. Saint MaarkandEya experienced this scene as "seeing everything insde HIM and yet outside HIM". This is the highest degree of "vishnu maayaa" which cannot be quantified or described to our perceptual faculties and cannot be conceived by physical, material and mortal intelligence (the memory of each birth or born soul). So the azhwwar has simply chosen to praise his thirumEni in "amalanaathi piraan" that CONTAIN everything and thus that represents every life science, or holy books, instead of going into the details of every holy book. Since HE revealed HIS Universal form only during Sri Krishna avathaaram and also showed the entire universe in HIS mouth twice, once to Yasodaa and then to MaarkandEya muni (who was sucked in and breathed out), aazhwaar chose to praise Lord Sri Krishnaa's physical eyes. In Srimath Bagwath Geetha Lord initiate Arjuna with his own eyes to see the Universal form and so the apt reference is made to Krishnaa's eyes here. One can, not only, see this reference in this aazhwaars song but in many other aazhwwar's song. Hence the aazhwaar finally suggests that a simple surrender to the "eyes of the LORD will do than to witness this maayaa and not understanding a bit of it". KaNan kaNkaLai kanDum, Arnagan adikaLai adainthum vaazhvathE kuRi, Sampath Rengarajan
- Next message: skaushik_at_MIT.EDU: "(no subject)"
- Previous message: Mohana Ramanujam: "Mani's poignant argument"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]