thirup paanaazhwaar and "pranavak krithi"
From the Bhakti List Archives
Sampath Rengarajan • Mon Dec 11 1995 - 11:51:06 PST
Thanks to Mr.PD for bringing this up again. Thanks to Mr. Sadagopan
for his excellant references and commentary on Swami Desikan's
"bagwath dyaana sObaanam". I have written a small thamizh sinthanai
"a thought in Tamil" (part 1) on bagwath bakthi and love for God. I
have also presented some views (part 2) based on a very primitive
analysis.
Part 1 **********Thetamil introduction starts**********************
oru sinthanai thodarum athan aRimukamum
saamanthi poo malarvathaRkku thEthi irukkiRathu
malligai poovukkum jaathi irukkiRathu
vanamaali en maalavaN meL varum kaathal poo malara
thEthiyum paarppathillai, jaathiyum paarppathillai.
aanmaavil uthithu ithayithil thoYththu kaNkaLil mudinthaal
athu bakthi para vasak kaNNeer
KaNNanaik kanda kaNkaLil arrambiththu ithayaththai ooduruvi en
annmaavil aikkiyamaanaal athu para bakthiyaam kaathal
ik kaathal varumaayin aan pen maRRum anthasthu pEtham kooda
paarppathillai.
adiyaar onRE, athan piNaippu.
aandavan sEvai mattumE athan ilakku.
maalavan "maayai"yaam kauviri pOl ik kaathalum than
kaRaikalai thaanE ittukk koLkinRana.
kaalakaalamaaka odik koNdirukkum
iv vadiyaarkaLin kaathal veLLaththil itho innum iru thuLikaL.
"a malaanaathipiraan thantha adikalE pORRi,
u yar thiru thamizh maRai chaarum thantha uththama muniyE pORRi,
m aRaiththu MaRai porul thantha, maraa thirup pugazh
- sEr paanaazhwaar thiruvadikaE pORRi
Sampath Rengarajan
******************Tamil introduction ends*************************
Part 2
There were two versions of loka saaranga muni's revealtions on
aazhwaar accounted so far. And there was an excellant commentary and
references on "bagwath dyaana sObaanam" and the "basis" on thirup
paanaazhwaar's "amalanaathi piraan" presented earlier here. I wanted
to go deeper and analyse into the notion of Swami Desikan. Swami
Desikan empahsised that these ten songs has the esssence of "thamizh
maRai" (4000), and hence the essence of all the vedas, or contain the
essense of all the vedaanthaarthangaL. Though I donot claim
authorship or merit for this primitive research of mine, I feel that
the causes of all causes Lord Arangan is the soul reason for this. I
welcome any comments from all bakthaas of this group.
Swami Desikan implied that amalanaathi piraan completely
summarises the inner meaning of tamizh maRai. There are citations
that when bramhaa was created from achuthan's novel, subsequently the
rudraas, and gayathri mantram were coming out of his Face. For
someone rational, birth from umblical chord is meaningful (bramhaa)
but the creation of others from face may not be agreed for
rationality. But there are clues to support the "content" that HIS
thirumEni "contains" EVERYTHING and EVERYONE at the end of each cycle
or pralayaa. And THIS IS THAT particular thirumEni that the aazhwaar
sees in "Aranga raajan". In paadhuha sahasram in Desikap prabandam
the reference to the other contribution of one other part of the
thirumEni is provided ie His divine lotus feet and the "unfolding
content" was "Ganges" during the instant of tiruvikrama avathaaram.
Quantifying the lord with "physical" interpretation is meaningful to
those who knows what are present in HIM. But for others they may
question the validity of the arguement that the 10 songs on the Lords
thirumEni ([gross anatomy], forgive me for this word. This is
presented here only for the understanding of the unknown and rational
readers) alone represents the essence of thamizh maRai. There are
several references to maahalukshmi residing in his thiru maarbu or
"chest". I wanna recall a personal experience and share it with the
group. During the iraappaththu festival as a member of the ubayak
kaaraas I had the privileage to touch and worship the thiruvangi, (his
dress) abayahastham, and thirup paathukai that nammperumaan wears
(uthsavar) and also the kavachams that were the aabaranams for the
Lord Arangan himself (moolavar). The pachchaik kal or known as
maragathak kal that is in the center of the kavacham for HIS chest is
supposed to have the indentations inside it as "mahaalakshmi". We
were told that this is visible only to those who are qualified souls.
When few of us reported they didnot see anything, few of us did see
the thiruvuruvam of Sri Mahaalakshmi carved in the stone. The thiru
aabaranams are not offered for special darshan of anyone anymore since
last 10 years or so.
One can conclude that describing the creation, preservation
and destruction of the universe, everything in it and every soul that
dwells in it, will truly represent the "Life Science". Based on some
fumdamental belief and in the line of our philoposhy, If we talk about
the process of physical creation of the universe, and the existance of
various medium, maintenance of this order by various faculties and
destruction and the "start all over again" cycle, it will represent
the true nature of life science, all holy books that talk about it and
all scientific theories that were invented, to be invented, unfolding
to be unfolded etc.. While Such rational science is by itself
dis"covering" many new facts, one should view the two other "creations
(rudraas etc, and ganges) or unfolding contents at the start" listed
above and one would also take into account some other references from
4000. There are references to "uNdu umizhntha thEvarkal" and "echchil
thEvarkaL" in the Tamizh maRai implying that HE contained or swallowed
all the demigods in Himself and unfolded or created them at the start
of every cycle. But he alone existed for ever. There are so many
references that Ezhisai or 7 musics, (also 7 worlds and 7 seas 7
mountains) and aaru angams or six vedangams, (also six gunaas), five
boodams or elements , 4 vedass, three lords, and the two (divine
couple) are all concluded in one syllabal ("pranavam" ie the concept
of amalnaathi piraan) (the modern theory of the universe being
condensed into dense sound material and unfolding from that, may find
support from this) and that the cycle unfolds and folds again as shown
in several paasurams in 4000.
The research points to the fact that in each shektram the lord
is in one form or another. In arangam, he is in the form of the
"pranavam" and his mode is the "creator of pranavam" itself. ie
"pranavak krithi". "pranava" by virtue of containing everything in
itslef at the time of unfolding and folding, is the cause of
everything. At some point when the cycle is not even started or
between the end and start, the "pranavaa" itself was contained and
unfolded or created by this Lord Arangan who is the "pranavak krithi".
Hence HE is the causes of all causes. Amalannathi piraan's reference
to this implied meaning makes it the "container of all maRai" and thus
amalanaathi piraan might have been viewed by Swami Desikan as the
essence of all essences.
As Arangan, He not only condensed everything to one sound
syllable or "oR ezhuththu" but also HE CONTAINED them all in his mouth
as Lord Krishna. Saint MaarkandEya experienced this scene as "seeing
everything insde HIM and yet outside HIM". This is the highest degree
of "vishnu maayaa" which cannot be quantified or described to our
perceptual faculties and cannot be conceived by physical, material and
mortal intelligence (the memory of each birth or born soul). So the
azhwwar has simply chosen to praise his thirumEni in "amalanaathi
piraan" that CONTAIN everything and thus that represents every life
science, or holy books, instead of going into the details of
every holy book.
Since HE revealed HIS Universal form only during Sri Krishna
avathaaram and also showed the entire universe in HIS mouth twice,
once to Yasodaa and then to MaarkandEya muni (who was sucked in and
breathed out), aazhwaar chose to praise Lord Sri Krishnaa's physical
eyes. In Srimath Bagwath Geetha Lord initiate Arjuna with his own
eyes to see the Universal form and so the apt reference is made to
Krishnaa's eyes here. One can, not only, see this reference in this
aazhwaars song but in many other aazhwwar's song. Hence the aazhwaar
finally suggests that a simple surrender to the "eyes of the LORD will
do than to witness this maayaa and not understanding a bit of it".
KaNan kaNkaLai kanDum, Arnagan adikaLai adainthum vaazhvathE kuRi,
Sampath Rengarajan
- Next message: skaushik_at_MIT.EDU: "(no subject)"
- Previous message: Mohana Ramanujam: "Mani's poignant argument"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
