Sri Vaidyanathan's message d. 24 Dec '02

From the Bhakti List Archives

• December 26, 2002


Dear Bhaktas,

In the 11 slokas of Dasaka 90, Bhattathiri quotes authorities to support his belief in Narayana as the supreme One.  In sloka 5/Dasaka90, he quotes Sankara himself in support: 
  "Even the blessed divine Sankaracharya honours Thee alone among those (deities) having attributes. 
  He is not indeed a     sectarian. He commented upon Sahasranama and other hymns centred on Thee, 
  and at the end of his life, intent on Thy praise, attained salvation." 
  (Extract from "Narayaneeyam" by P.N. Menon, Educational Supplies Depot, Palghat, 1988).
Dasan
Krishnaswamy M.K.

> [Original Message]
> From: B VAIDYANATHAN 
> To: 
 > Date: 12/24/2002 3:34:25 PM
> Subject: HINDU PHILOSOPHY
>
>DEAR FRIENDS,

>I HAVE A QUESTION FOR ALL.

> WHY DO WE HAVE IYER AND IYENGARS AS SUB SECTS IN
> BRAHMINS/HINDUISM,ONLY IN TAMILNAD.

> THE SAME IS NOT THERE IN KERALA.

> HERE ALL GODS ARE WORSHIPPED BY BRAHMINS.THERE IS NO SUBSECTS.

> NARAYANA BHATTATHRI WHO SANG NARAYANEEYAM WAS AN EXPONENT OF POORVA
MEEMANSA,WHICH IS ADVAITA.HE REALISED GOD IN HUMAN FORM.DO WE HAVE TO
TEACH THE DIFFERENT PHILOSOPHY TO OUR CHILDREN.CAN'T WE MAKE THEM AS ONE
BY SAYING ALL GODS ARE EQAL AND SAME.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------------------------------------------
           - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH -
To Post a message, send it to:   bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com
Group Home: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bhakti-list
Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/
 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/