Re: (unknown)
From the Bhakti List Archives
• December 3, 2002
Srimathe Ramanujaya Namaha Dear Shri Shreyas, I just want to let everyone know that I am not trying to interpret Nammazhwar's pasuram on my own nor am I trying to support anya-devata worship. I am a person who strictly follows Mamunigal's pasuram you quoted:) All that I said was that, it really matters to one to realize that HE is one and his own form is that of Sriman Narayanan according to the Vedas and all other forms are none but his manifestations(like Siva, Brahma etc) which cannot be compared to HIM. Let us also not forget the first pasuram of Nammazhwar from his last ten "Muniye Nanmugane Mukkannappa En Pollakkanivai...." My point was not to support anya-devatha worship! But, to just remind everyone that the form really doesn't matter as long as we see Sriman Narayanan in those forms. WELL! Seeing paramatman in one is DEFINITELY different from saying that it is paramatman. It is the my understanding that the former abides Vishistadvaitam while the latter is the Advaitin's perspective:) And I don't see a reason why Sri Visu's quote was irrelevant in that context I still would stick to the point that the quote was pretty appropriate to the context. But I never meant that Shri Visu's opinions/interpretations on that pasuram were appropriate as I wouldn't even want to comment on them. Sarva Aparaadhaan Kshamasva! Adiyen Ramanuja Dasan, Lakshmi Narasimhan -------Original Message------- From: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Date: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 18:38:45 To: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Subject: (unknown) Sri: Srimate Ramanujaya Namaha Dear Sri Visu and Sri Narasimhan, I am reproducing the moderator's comments here. Since it has been appended to the tail-end of the postings, others may have missed it. .............. .............. Finally, let us reflect on the very relevant pAsuram of Sri Manavala Mamuni's Upadesa Rattinamalai, that Sri Narasimhan had brought up: munnOr mozhin^tha muRai thappAmaR_kEttu * pinnOrn^thu thAmathanaip pEsAthE * - tham_nenjil thORRinathE solli ithu_suththa upathEsa_vara vARRathenbar * moorkkarAvAr. sarvamsrIkrishArpanmasthu. adiyEn rAmAnuja dAsan, -Shreyas -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Group Home: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bhakti-list Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Group Home: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bhakti-list Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: Narasimhan Krishnamachari: "SrI vishNu sahasra nAmam - Slokam 79 - Part 5."
- Previous message: Venkatanathan Athreya: "Re: Re: ArchAvataram"
- In reply to: Shreyas Sarangan: "(unknown)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]