Re: Ramayanam and Divya Prabhandam
From the Bhakti List Archives
• November 30, 2002
Dear Shri Harikrishnan, You are right about Necklace. There is no reference about necklace theory in Kamba Ramayanam. And moreover if VALI had that power thru the NECKLACE, he need not have had a war for years with Dhundubi and Maayaavi. So the necklace theory does not hold FIT. I request you to post your "Writings" on that if Moderator permits.. We can discuss vaali vatham in detail here as it is one of the controversial subjects. My query on conventional statement.: There is no reference that vaali abducted Ruma spouse of sukrivaai and vaali does not accept that anytime. May be as sukriva ran away for life, he left Ruma back. If we say that RAMA killed vaali as he had attached RUMA spouse of sukrivaa, then he should have done the same to SUKRIVA as he had attached Thaara after vaali's demise according to Valmiki. So this theory does not seem to FIT. Regards, Nanmaaran --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Group Home: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bhakti-list Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: Narasimhan Krishnamachari: "SrI vishNu sahasra nAmam - Slokam 79 - Part 3."
- Previous message: Nanmaaran: "Re: Andal's greatness - Smt Vathsala Srinivasan's Question"
- In reply to: Hari Krishnan: "Re: Ramayanam and Divya Prabhandam"
- Next in thread: Hari Krishnan: "Re: Ramayanam and Divya Prabhandam"
- Reply: Hari Krishnan: "Re: Ramayanam and Divya Prabhandam"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]