Kainkaryam-1
From the Bhakti List Archives
• December 28, 2001
Srimate Srivansatkopa Sri Vedanta Desika Yatindra Mahadesikaya Nama: Kainkaryam-1 _______________ All human organs, apart from the obvious physical functions they perform, are also intended to be used in the service of the Lord. All of us are servants of Emperuman,(SEshAs) and it is only appropriate that our faculties are utilised for His kainkaryam. In performing this kainkaryam, shastras and the conduct of Poorvacharyas are our guiding star as to the manner and type of service that is to be rendered. It should be done in a manner that pleases the Lord (“SEshi uganda kainkaryam”), and should be in addition to the duties that are enjoined upon us, depending upon varNA and Ashrama (like Sandhyavandanam, agnihotram,etc.). For instance, Emperuman would not like us to light up the lamps in His temple in the evening, forgoing our basic duty of performing Sandhyavandanam. Based on the foregoing, Acharyas have classified Kainkaryam into two categories- AgnyA kainkaryam and anugnyA kainkaryam. Those duties, which we have to perform compulsorily, (like Sandhyavandanam,pitru tarpanam,pancha maha yagyas,etc) come under the first category, while decorating the Lord’s temple with lamps, putting together garlands for Him, etc. fall under the second. One may ask, “If we are compelled to perform an act, how could it be service or kainkaryam, which has an in-built element of choice and willingness?” Our Sampradaya lays down that the ultimate purpose of all these acts of worship (including Sandhyopasanam, agnihotram,yagas, yagyas etc.) is to please the Lord (“SrimanNarayana preetyarttham or Bhagavat kainkarya roopam”). Hence Agnya kainkaryam has to be performed before anugnya kainkaryam could even be thought of. A father is not pleased with his son, who ignores whatever tasks have been set for him, but insists on pressing the father’s feet in an expression of love and concern. This is illustrated by the following verse from the Bhagavat Gita- “Shrui:smriti: mamaiva AgyA-yastAm ullanghya vartatE AgyAcchEdI mama drOhI mama bhaktOpi na Vaishnava:” Guruparampara has it that Sri Ramanuja stood up with great difficulty, with the support of his disciples, even at the ripe old age of 120, to offer Arghya pradAnam during Sandhyavandanam, thus demonstrating his respect for the Agnya kainkaryam, even in the face of physical inability.. Having said this, Azhwars and Acharyas have laid down clearly the types of kainkaryam that are to be performed with each of our faculties. Perhaps the most comprehensive prescription is from the Mukunda MAlA of Sri Kulasekhara Perumal, reproduced below: - “JihvE keertaya Kesavam Muraripum chEtO bhaja Sridharam pANi dvandva samarcchaya stOtra Achuta kathA shrOtra dvaya tvam shruNu Krishnam lOkaya lOchana dvaya, HarE:gaccha anghri yugma Alayam Jighra ghrANa Mukunda pAda tulaseem moordhan nama AdhOkshajam” This shlOka incorporates the essence of kainkarya, as perceived by Azhwars, and is worth going over line by beautiful line, to fully appreciate its abundant significance. “JihvE keertaya Kesavam”- The tongue is an extremely important part of our physique, and is often the cause of embarrassment and trouble, if not kept under control. It is difficult to keep the tongue idle, for, man is a social animal who finds it difficult to remain silent. Therefore, to canalise its function into productive channels, Azhwar prescribes chanting of the Lord’s holy names. And how long are we supposed to chant His names? Says Poygai Azhwar, “sollum tanayum tozhumin, vizhum udambu sellum tanayum TirumAlai…….nAmatthAl EtthudirEl nandru”- “Till your last breath, as long as it is physically possible, do continue chanting the Lord’s names” exhorts Azhwar. The same Azhwar wonders” You have been blessed with a tongue capable of praising the Lord. You also have an extremely short, potent and sweet mantra like the ahstAkshara, incorporating the Narayana nAmam. Despite being provided with such infallible routes to liberation, it is indeed surprising that some still fall prey to bad ways.” “nA vAyil uNdE, namO nAraNA endru-OvAdu uraikkum urai uNdE moovAda mA gatikkaN chellum vagai uNdE-ennoruvar thee gatikkaN chellum tiram”. The following couplet reflects the same idea- “Narayana iti shabdOsti, vak asti vasa vartinI tatApi narakE ghOrE patanti kim adbhutam ! » And how should the Lord’s name be chanted? So continuous and intense should be the chanting that it leaves a scar on the tongue, according to another Azhwar, who says,” nA tazhumba nAranA endru Etthi”. “unnai koNdu en nA agam pAl mAtru indri uraitthu koNdEn” supplements Sri Periazhwar. Why is nAma sankeertanam so effective? The Bhagavan nAma is the essence of all Vedas, (“Madhavan pEr solluvadE Otthin surukku”-_Bhootattazhwar) and is as effective, though much easier than performing penance (tapas)”Etthi paNindu avan pEr eerainnooru eppozhudum sAtthi uraitthal tavam”. Azhwar’s reference to “eerainnooru pEr” (2x500 names) is obviously to the Sri Vishnu Sahasranama Stotram, and its chanting is equated here to performing tapas. And the word,”eppozhudum” indicates that the Lord’s name should be on our tongue always. Even while exhorting us to have the Lord’s name always on our lips, Azhwars are categorical that chanting the name of any other is taboo, and not even to be thought of. Says Poigai Azhwar, “MAyavanai allAl irayEnum EtthAdu en nA”. « Vai avanai alladu vAzhttAdu » he reiterates in another pasuram. Sri Nammazhwar is more categorical in his refusal to sing the praise of anyone other than Emperuman- “nA koNdu mAnidam pAdEn”, « en nAvil in kavi yAn oruvarkkum kodukkilEn »,etc. Even IlangO adigaL, a Jain hermit, emphasises the same idea in SilappadikAram, one of the five great Tamil kAvyAs- “panchavarkku doodu nadandAnai EtthAda nA enna nAvE Narayana ennA nA ennA nAvE »- Is it a tongue at all, which does not sing the praise of the Lord Narayana who, in all His soulabhyam, made Himself a lowly messenger of the Pandavas? enquires Ilango rhetorically. In a further refinement of the concept, some Azhwars aver that chanting the tirunAmam of BhAgavatAs (the Lord’s devotees) is even sweeter than reciting Emperuman’s haloed names. In an endearing display of BhAgavata SEshatvam, Sri Madurakavi Azhwar says, “KaNNi nuN siruttAmbinAl kattuNNa paNNia peru Mayan- ennappanil naNNi ten Kurugoor nambi ennakkAl aNNikkum amudoorum en nAvukkE” For Sri Madurakavi, Sri Nammazhwar’s tirunAmam sits sweeter on his tongue, than that of that of the Lord Himself. The same idea is portrayed in the following Nanmukhan TiruvandAdi pasuram- “MArAya dAnavanai vaLLugirAl –MArviraNdu koorAga keeriya KOLariyai-vErAga Etthi iruppArai vellumE-matru avarai SAtthi iruppAr tavam » Sri Tirumazhisai Piran extolls the virtues of those pinning their faith on BhAgavatAs, vis-a vis the votaries of Sri Nrsimha Himself. Sri Periazhwar doesn’t mince his words, while castigating those whose tongues are strangers to the Lord’s names- “naraka nAsanai nAvil koNdu azhayAda mAnida sAdiar parugu neerum udukkum kooraiyum pAvam seidana » Those who do not chant Emperuman’s tirunAmam are sinners- even the water they drink and the clothes they wear must indeed have sinned, to be consumed by such heretics, according to Sri VishnuchitthA. True to its nature, the tongue has indeed been long-winded, and adiyen craves the indulgence of bhagavatas for continuing on “ Mura ripum ChEtO bhaja “in the next posting. Srimate Sri LakshmiNrsimha divya paduka sevaka Srivan Satakopa Sri Narayana Yatindra Mahadesikaya Nama: ------------dasan,sadagopan.. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send your FREE holiday greetings online! http://greetings.yahoo.com -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Previous message: go moothram: "some doubts"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]