Re: nityatvam of jIva-s & paratvam of SrIman-nArAyaNa
From the Bhakti List Archives
• December 11, 2001
--- In bhakti-list@y..., "tg_ram"wrote: > It is said that the jIva-s always existed from beginningless time. > > How do we understand this correctly, in conjunction with the paratvam > of SrIman-nArAyaNa ? > Dear Ramkumar, I presume your question is the following. If the jIvas are said to exist eternally, does this not affect the infinitude and absolute paramountcy (paratva) of the paramAtman SrIman-nArAyaNa? The answer is that the eternality of the jIvas is itself dependent on the nitya-icchA (eternal will) of the paramAtman. The idea is that the jIvas' very existence is rooted in the eternal will of the Lord. Theoretically, the Lord, if He so chooses, can decide that the jIvas should no longer exist. But His will is such that they do. There is a sloka by Kurattalvan that expresses this idea (unfortunately I cannot recall it right now). The Svetasvatara Upanishad declares in no uncertain terms 'na tat samaSca-abhyadhikaS ca dRSyate' -- there is nothing equal or greater than It. This is echoed by our Alvar in 'ottAr mikkArai ilaiyAya mAmAya!'. The implication is that not only is there nothing that can compare with the Parabrahman in terms of total infinitude and other kalyANa-guNas, but even if some entity shares some quality with It, that entity depends on its glory on the Parabrahman, whereas the Parabrahman depends on absolutely nothing else. The liberated jIva enjoys the same bliss as the Parabrahman (mam sAdharmyam AgataH, says Lord Krishna in the Gita). As you have indicated, all jIvas share the quality of eternality with the Lord. For that matter, even the stuff of the universe (acit or prakRti) is eternal. However, all these derive their guNas from the paramAtman, whereas He derives them from nothing else. The very definition of the word 'Brahman' conveys this idea. Brahman, while also signifying the jIva and acit, principally signifies the Supreme Reality because of a unique twofold meaning. Sri Ramanuja cites an ancient authority that assigns the name Brahman to the Supreme because, not only is it Great, it *imparts* Greatness to everything else (bRhatvAt bRhmaNatvAt brahmA iti). This is the idea one should keep in mind when one says, "SrI lakshmI-nRsimha *parabrahmaNe* namaH", "SrI lakshmI- hayavadana parabrahmaNe namaH", etc. rAmAnuja dAsa, Mani -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: tg_ram: "Re: nityatvam of jIva-s & paratvam of SrIman-nArAyaNa"
- Previous message: lsrinivas: "Request for Information"
- In reply to: tg_ram: "nityatvam of jIva-s & paratvam of SrIman-nArAyaNa"
- Next in thread: tg_ram: "Re: nityatvam of jIva-s & paratvam of SrIman-nArAyaNa"
- Reply: tg_ram: "Re: nityatvam of jIva-s & paratvam of SrIman-nArAyaNa"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]