Re: Clarification on VibheeshaNa and Bharatha's SaraNagathi
From the Bhakti List Archives
• December 7, 2001
SrI: SrImathE Gopaladesika mahadesikaya namah: Dear Smt Raji Sridhar, Your question made me enjoy Sri Rama's KalyANa guNAs. He was Lord's incarnation. dharmO vigrahavaan. Still, He hid the Lordship qualities in Him during this avtaar. AtmAnAm mAnusham manyE rAmam dasarathAthmajam. He called himself as just son of Darasaratha, a mere human being. When VisheeshaNan surrenders to Rama, Ramam being dharmO vigrahavaan, letss other key personnel in His group to give their opinions. That is His Greatness. He could have simply said, "I know. No body need to talk. I am accepting VibheeshaNan. " Knowing Rama's valour others would have swallowed their words that they had in their minds. Sugreevan said, "He is from the enemy's camp; His own brother; It is a tactical move on RavaNan to send him here. Also, He has got a very dangerous weapon with him. (what visheeshaNan had was only a gadhA in his hand. nothing else. how could that be a very dangerous weapon which can destroy Rama. (vyAkhyAna chakravartthi Sri Periyavaacchaan PiLLai in his Ramayana thanislOkam vyAkhyAnam says: Sugreeva did not mean the gadhA as the dangerous weapon. He meant that posture of VibheeshaNan.. "anjali mudhrA" and tears rolling won his cheeks.. That anjali mudrA and uttering "saraNam" perforing SaraNAgathy, is the most dangerous weapon to conquer Rama! (what a beautiful explanation!) It is Rama's kalyAna gunA' sowseelyam to have asked for Sugreevan's HanumAn's comments before he decides. Rama was a king; Sugreevan was also a king; Rama had actually sought Sugreevan's help in his venture. So it was natural for Rama to have asked others for their opinions. Sugreevan said" He ie bad with wrong intention. Do not accept him. Hanumaan said, "He is good; He helped me (when I was captured.). Accept him. Rama said, "I take Sugreevan's statement as well as Hanumaan's. I will take Sugreevan's statement "he is bad":. Hanumaan's statement "Accept him." WHY? Rama says."anyone who surrenders- whoever that being is- it is my vow to protect him (or it)." our AchAryAs have been moved by the this categorical declaration and pledge and always glorify this in their Sri Sookthis. The meaning of this slokA (sakrdEva prapannAya ... vratham mama.") is: That individual who has surrendered himself only once pleading that he is to be protected, to him, I assure complete protection and this is my vow." Later Rama immediately performed VibheeshaNa pattAbhishEkam then and there befroe even winning over Ravanan. I have heard this is upanyasam. It seemss Sugreevan asked as to why he did that? What will happen if tomorrow Ravanan comes and surrenders? You have already made VisheeshaNan the king. Rama answered." I will give Ravanan (if he comes and surrenders) ayOdhyA.." (what a quality and kalyANa guNA!) [It is not even Rma's kingdon now. It is Bharatha's (or PadhukA's)How could Rama say that? Rama's brothers are not like other brothers .. namely, Sugreevan, Vaali; Ravanan, VibheeshaNan, et al. Here they are daasa bhUthars and Sesha bhUthars.] Please forgive me for my indulgence. Learned scholars correct /supplement this. SrI SeethalakshaNa Hanumath samEtha Sri Ramachandra parabrahmaNE namah: Regards Narayana Narayana NarayaNa dAsan madhavakkannan ----Original Message Follows---- From: RAJI SRIDHARTo: Madhavakkannan V CC: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: Clarification on VibheeshaNa and Bharatha's SaraNagathi Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 08:10:36 -0800 (PST) Pranams Sriman Madhavakannan After reading this one doubt arised. Hope you will clarify. When Lord knows saranagati made by vibhishenan was correct as per perfect sastra vihita(even if a jeevatma didn't surrender as per sastra, Lord would take that jeevatma also) and He also knows that He is going to take him, Why did Lord asked every others opinion? Pranams raji sridhar _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: Madhavakkannan V: "Five angas of Prapatti and Atma nikshepam"
- Previous message: Mani Varadarajan: "From Sri Sadagopan Iyengar"
- Maybe in reply to: Madhavakkannan V: "Clarification on VibheeshaNa and Bharatha's SaraNagathi"
- Next in thread: RAJI SRIDHAR: "Ramayanam"
- Reply: RAJI SRIDHAR: "Ramayanam"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]