Re: viShNu sthAnam
From the Bhakti List Archives
• December 1, 2001
> The heart of the issue really, is that while SrIvaishNavas are > vaishnavites, smArthas are *not* Saivites! It is somewhat > absurd to try compare a qualifier with a disqualifier - but > that's as specific as it gets over there in the murky realm of > numerous demigods and confusing messages. Sriman Murali Seshadri's question was about anya-devata aradhana.The heart of the issue addressed by my reply to Sri.Murali Sheshadri was, what are the implications on anya-devata worship/bhajans some Sri Vaishnava groups outside of India? It is understood from his email that due to physical proximity to such groups, and consequently involvement in the group's activities, what are the implications of anya-devata worship? >From a Sri Vaishnava Stand point, it is circuitous to worship anya-devatas or for that matter, to regard anya-devatas as paramAtma.But given the fact of certain geographical constraints, and a wider mode of participation, the Sri Vaishnava involved in bhajans which extoll the anya-devatas as paramatma should realise that all the namaskArams finally reach keshava who is undoubtedly the "chaturvan" as Thirumangai Alvar describes him. > > But IS there any confusion on the central question - i.e. that > of supremacy of nArAyaNa (embodied by viShNu alone)? There is > none. All SankarAchAryas (as legatees of AdiSankara) sign off > their written statements with "nArAyaNa smrithi". Further, the > viShNupurANa is one of their source texts (alongwith Bhagavad > geethA and the 10 principal upanishads). So if at all there is > some uncertainty it is because the smArtha tradition does not > confine itself to viShNu alone (even as it recognizes the primacy > of viShNu sthAnam) but includes other demigods in its worship. > No there is no doubt that the ultimate veda swaroopi is lakshmi sametha sriman nArAyana. When adiyen sent a mail about Appayya Dikshita's literary works, adiyed was seeking to extoll the uniqueness of the word nArAyana and that nArAyanA is the parabrahman is doubtless. Regards, Malolan Cadambi __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: ramesh_4_at_vsnl.net: "Clarification reg. recitation of tamil pasurams"
- Previous message: bindinganavale suresh: "Re:A ? On Contemplative Meditation In Visishtadvaita"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]