Fwd: Re: [pA'ncarAtra - An Overview - Part 7.]
From the Bhakti List Archives
• December 14, 2000
Dear Bhakta-s: I received the following comments from SrI M. S. Hari, which I am sharing with you all because I consider these valuable comments. I also understand that SrI Hari is putting together a detailed description of the SrI pA'ncarAtra Agama, and I am looking forward to learning from his write-ups. -dAsan kRshNamAcAryan --- "M.S.HARI Madabhushi Sarangarajan Hari"wrote: > Date: 14 Dec 00 23:15:12 SGT > From: M.S.HARI Madabhushi Sarangarajan Hari > To: Narasimhan Krishnamachari , mshari@usa.net > Subject: Re: [pA'ncarAtra - An Overview - Part 7.] > > Dear SrI Narasimhan Krishnamachari > > Your explanation in English on "The viSAkha-yUpa or the brahma-yUpa" > was nice. I enjoyed reading it. But I have a small suggestion here: > > >The concept of the vyUha emanations from para-vAsudeva is related to > >the pillar of light resplendently located in SrI vaikuNTham, and > said > >to be assumed by the Deity for the purpose of meditation by the > yogi-s. > >The pillar has four nodes, each facing one of the four principal > >directions. The topmost node is altogether bright light, > representing > >vyUha-vAsudeva. Nothing is discernible at this level except Pure > >Effulgence. > > This is fine. But you may add some points that this "except Pure > Effulgence" in vyUha-vAsudeva is not in any way connected with > "nirviSEsha chin mAtram" concept of gaudapAdiya/SAnkara matham. > Because, there is a possiblity for begginners to mistake > "except pure effulgence" - "effulgence" - can be taken to mean > jngyAna and "except pure" may be taken for "nirviSEsha". > > > >LakshmI-tantra also identifies samkarshaNa with the individual soul, > >pradyumna with individual awareness (buddhi), and aniruddha with the > >sense of ego (ahamkAra). The idea is that sankarshNa provides the > >foundation for all the individual souls, pradyumna enters into the > >souls, seizes hold of the faculty of awareness and distinguishes > >between the subjective and objective frames of reference, and > aniruddha > >projects the world of multiplicity and differentiations. > > This is fine. But I suggest that you may highlight the tarka-pAdam > here with specific references to the uthpathyasambhavAdhikaraNam > in the Brahma sUtra's avirOdha-adyAyam. > > ...... > > Thanks & Regards > M.S.HARI RAmAnuja DAsan (mshari@usa.net) > > > ____________________________________________________________________ > Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. http://shopping.yahoo.com/ -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@eGroups.com Search archives at http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/index.html#SEARCH
- Next message: Narasimhan Krishnamachari: "Fwd: Re: [pA'ncarAtra - An Overview - Part 7.]"
- Previous message: Chandrashekaran Venkataraman: "RE: [Kapila muni's sAnkhyA]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]