RE: [Kapila muni's sAnkhyA]
From the Bhakti List Archives
• December 14, 2000
Dear Sri Hari, Thanks for a detailed mail on this subject. Please note that I wasn't in any way advocating sAnkhyam. My question was different. I wanted to know why is there a contrast between Kapila muni's svarUpam and His theory ? He being Sriman Narayana amsam why did he postulate a theory that rejects paramAthmA? Is it a foible that he was an amsam of Sriman Narayana ? Or Is it that he was just another controversial sage like Sage Parasurama who in spite of being Sriman Narayana amsam engaged in atrocities to kshathriyAs ? Thanks, chandrasekaran. -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@eGroups.com Search archives at http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/index.html#SEARCH
- Next message: Narasimhan Krishnamachari: "Fwd: Re: [pA'ncarAtra - An Overview - Part 7.]"
- Previous message: vishnu75_at_iitian.com: "Ubhaya Vedanta Sabha Homepages"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]