From the Bhakti List Archives
Chandrashekaran Venkataraman
• Thu Dec 14 2000 - 09:54:52 PST
Dear Sri Hari,
Thanks for a detailed mail on this subject. Please note
that I wasn't in any way advocating sAnkhyam. My question
was different. I wanted to know why is there a contrast
between Kapila muni's svarUpam and His theory ? He being
Sriman Narayana amsam why did he postulate a theory that
rejects paramAthmA? Is it a foible that he was an amsam
of Sriman Narayana ? Or
Is it that he was just another controversial sage like
Sage Parasurama who in spite of being Sriman Narayana amsam
engaged in atrocities to kshathriyAs ?
Thanks,
chandrasekaran.
--------------------------------------------------------------
- SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH -
To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@eGroups.com
Search archives at http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/index.html#SEARCH
