Re: Love vs. legalism in Vaishnavism?
From the Bhakti List Archives
• August 14, 1999
> >Suffice it to say that ritual is *involved* in SaraNAgati (we prostrate >before God as a sign of surrender, do we not?), but ritual is not >*primary*. > Dear Sri mani, I guess, I should have qualified the term "ritual" as per my understanding. The correct usage would be "limited ritual as required by one's acharya". Is it not true that the one's birth status requiers certain rituals, for example, Bhramins are required to perform more rituals then the non-bhramins, seeking refuge? Best regards. Venkatesh _______________________________________________________________ Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com
- Next message: Ashesan_at_aol.com: "Introduction."
- Previous message: Mohan R Sagar: "net meeting with HH Sri Jeear Swamy"
- Maybe in reply to: a c: "Love vs. legalism in Vaishnavism?"
- Next in thread: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: Love vs. legalism in Vaishnavism?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]