Re: sandhyAvandanam
From the Bhakti List Archives
• August 3, 1999
Mani wrote: > It seems your position is that it is ok to do sandhyAvandanam without > thinking of PerumaaL. I respectfully request pramANa-s from acharyas' > writings in the Sri Vaishnava sampradAya. In the meantime, I will take > Swami Periyavaaccaan Pillai's explanation over yours. It appears to me that this discussion concerns the following questions: [1] SHOULD sandhyAvandanam be done without thinking of PerumAL? [2] CAN sandhyAvandanam be done without thinking of PerumAL? [3] Is the act of sandhyAvandanam useful either way? Obviously, the answer to [1] is NO. [2] is possible, by mindlessly repeating the chants and going through the actions in a mechanical way. I think many people feel that it is not sandhyAvandanam at all, if done in this way so perhaps it could be called by some other name. But the source of disagreement is mostly about [3]. Attempting to perform sandhyAvandanam (even mindlessly) may be better than not doing it at all. However there is no doubt in my mind that any/all of our AchAryas would agree that sandhyAvandanam is not just a nitya-karma but bhagavat-kainkaryam as well and that we must all strive to practice it as such. Likewise I am confident that our AchAryas would not chastise someone if they admitted to not thinking about PerumAL while doing their sandhyAvandanam. As NammAzhwAr said, "Poyyai sonnEn ... meyyai peRREn". Regards, -Srinath Chakravarty email: xsrinath@ti.com
- Next message: Mani Varadarajan: "Pictures of Bhakti List Members"
- Previous message: Venkat Nagarajan: "Classification of Reals Cont'd"
- Maybe in reply to: sudarshan madabushi: "sandhyAvandanam"
- Next in thread: Krishna Kalale: "RE: sandhyAvandanam"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]