A scientific interpretation for Gayathri mantra
From the Bhakti List Archives
• August 2, 1999
Just came across this interpretation for Gayathri mantra. Gayatri Mantra: A scientific view - Dr Tanmaya > > >Gayatri mantra has been bestowed the greatest importance in Vedic >dharma.This mantra has also been termed as Savitri and Ved-Mata, the mother >of the Vedas. The literal meaning of the mantra is: > >O God! You are Omnipresent, Omnipotent and Almighty. You >are all Light. You are all Knowledge and Bliss. >You are Destroyer of fear, You are Creator of this Universe, >You are the Greatest of all. We bow and meditate upon Your >light. You guide our intellect in the right direction. > >The mantra, however, has a great scientific import too, which >somehow got lost in the literary tradition. >The modern astrophysics and astronomy tell us that our Galaxy called Milky >Way or Akash-Ganga contains approximately 100,000 million of >stars. Each star is like our sun having its own planet system. We know that >the moon moves round the earth and the earth moves round the sun along with >the moon. All planets round the sun. Each of the above bodies revolves >round >at its own axis as well. Our sun along with its family takes one round of >the galactic centre in 22.5 crore years. >All galaxies including ours are moving away at a terrific velocity of >20,000 miles per second. > > And now the alternative scientific meaning of the mantra step by >step: >(A) Om bhur bhuvah swah: >Bhur the earth, bhuvah the planets (solar family), swah the Galaxy. >We observe that when an ordinary fan with a speed of 900 RPM >(rotations Per minute) moves, it makes noise. Then, one can imagine, what >great noise would be created when the galaxies move with a speed of 20,000 >miles per second. This is what this portion of the mantra explains that >the >sound produced due to the fast-moving earth, planets and galaxies is Om. >The sound was heard during meditation by Rishi Vishvamitra, who mentioned >it >to other colleagues. All of them, then unanimously decided to call this >sound Om the name of God, because this sound is available in all the three >periods of >time, hence it is set (permanent). Therefore, it was the first >never revolutionary idea to identify formless God with a specific title >(form) called upadhi. Until that time, everybody recognized God as formless >and nobody was prepared to accept this new idea. In the Gita also, it is >said, "Omiti ekaksharam brahma", meaning that the name of the Supreme is >Om, >which contains only one syllable (8/12). This sound Om heard during samadhi >was called by all the seers nada-brahma a very great noise), but not a >noise >that is normally beyond a specific amplitude and limits of decibels suited >to human hearing. Hence the rishis called this sound Udgith >musical sound of the above, i.e., heaven.They also noticed that the >infinite mass of galaxies moving with a velocity of 20,000 miles/second was >generating a kinetic energy = 1/2 MV2 and this was balancing the total >energy consumption of the cosmos. Hence they named it Pranavah, which >means the body (vapu) or store house of energy (prana). > > (B) Tat savitur varenyam: > Tat that (God), savitur the sun (star), varenyam worthy of >bowing or respect. Once the form of a person along with the name is known >to us, we may locate the specific person. Hence the two titles (upadhi) >provide the solid ground to identify the formless God, Vishvamitra >suggested. He told us that we could know (realize) the unknowable formless >God through the known factors, viz., sound Om and light of suns (stars).A >mathematician can solve an equation x2+y2=4; if x=2; then y can be known >and >so on. An engineer can measure the width of a river even by standing at >the >river bank just by >drawing a triangle. So was the scientific method suggested by >Vishvamitra in the mantra in the next portion as under:- > >(C) Bhargo devasya dheemahi: > >Bhargo the light, devasya of the deity, dheemahi we should meditate. The >rishi instructs us to meditate upon the available form (light of suns) to >discover the formless Creator (God). Also he wants us to do >japa of the word > >Om (this is understood in the Mantra). This is how the sage wants us >to proceed, but there is a great problem to realise it, as the human >mind is so shaky and restless that without the grace of the Supreme >(Brahma) it cannot be controlled. Hence Vishvamitra suggests the way to >pray >Him as >under: > > (D) Dhiyo yo nah prachodayat: > > Dhiyo (intellect), yo (who), nah (we all), prachodayat (guide >to right Direction). O God! Deploy our intellect on the right path. Full >scientific interpretation of the Mantra: The earth (bhur), the planets >(bhuvah), and the galaxies(swah) are moving at a very great velocity, the >sound produced is Om, (the name of formless God.) That God (tat), who >manifests Himself in the form of light of suns (savitur) is worthy of >bowing/respect(varenyam). We all, therefore, should meditate (dheemahi) >upon the light (bhargo) of that deity (devasya) and also do chanting of Om. >May He (yo) guide in right direction (prachodayat) our (nah) >intellect dhiyo So we notice that the important points hinted in the >mantra >are:- > 1) The total kinetic energy generated by the movement galaxies >acts as an umbrella and balances the total energy consumption of the >cosmos. Hence it was named as the Pranavah (body of energy). This is equal >to 1/2 mv2 (Mass of galaxies x velocity2). > > 2) Realising the great importance of the syllable OM, the other >later date religions adopted this word with a slight change in accent, >viz., >amen and Ameen. > >3)The God could be realised through the saguna (gross), upasana >(method), i.e., a) by chanting the name of the supreme as OM and >b) by meditating upon the light emitted by stars (suns). > > > AdiyEn Lakshmi Narasimhan
- Next message: Martin Gansten: "Sri Mukkur Laxmi Narasimha Tatacharya"
- Previous message: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: "sandhyAvandanam" and "visEsha-bhagavath-kainkaryam""
- Next in thread: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: A scientific interpretation for Gayathri mantra"
- Maybe reply: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: A scientific interpretation for Gayathri mantra"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]