Interpretation
From the Bhakti List Archives
• August 17, 1998
Dear Sri Anantha Padmanabhan on Date: 8/14/98 8:30 PM you wrote : Quote*************************************************************** Adiyen : The intention of Sri Ramesh has been unfortunately interpreted wrongly by Sri Venkatesh & adiyen can understand that it would have hurt him very badly. But , Sri Venkatesh didn't project that "hurt" in his later postings & was kind in taking that also somewhat lightly though he couldn't have digested his interpretation of Sri Ramesh's statement . Unquote******************************************************************* First, please accept my sincere apologies, because my wordings in my post made you think that I have misinterpreted and I have been hurt. In reality no. I did not interpret what Sri Ramesh wrote as "against the ThiruvallikkENi vaasees". Actually Sri Ramesh was very much right in writing ".. altogether different in executing it day-in and day-out..". None of us, atleast, to be true, myself, are strictly following what Krishna has said in Bhagavadh Gita day-in and day-out. My interpretation was Sri Ramesh is exactly bringing out this point. Actually the thrust in my lines on the above is only that "Just because the prapannas are not following, exactly, what the GeethAchAryan has said, the PerumAL in the Divya DEsam does not lose His prominence to another PerumAL in another Divya DEsam. Here this was Ahobilam. I was only presenting my view that ThiruvallikkENi, Srirangam, ThiruvEngadam and Thiruatthiyur emberumAns are "osatthi" compared to Ahobilam. Once again this a part of the divine argument that is going on. I also concluded that "..I have no disregards for Ahobilam in anyway or could there be any for anybody. All the above is meant only in a lighter vein." So, I reiterate that I have not misterpreted what Sri Ramesh wrote and also that I has not hurt me in any way. I once again place my sincere apologies if I have hurt any one's feeling. adiyEn RAmAnuja dAsan Thirumalai Vinjamoor Venkatesh
- Next message: Ramanbil_at_aol.com: "(no subject)"
- Previous message: Sadagopan: "Re: sannyasa dharmam- clarification please!"
- Next in thread: TV.Venkat_at_frco.com: "Re: Interpretation"
- Maybe reply: TV.Venkat_at_frco.com: "Re: Interpretation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]