Interpretation
From the Bhakti List Archives
Unknown Sender • Mon Aug 17 1998 - 06:23:40 PDT
Dear Sri Anantha Padmanabhan
on Date: 8/14/98 8:30 PM you wrote :
Quote***************************************************************
Adiyen : The intention of Sri Ramesh has been unfortunately
interpreted wrongly by
Sri Venkatesh & adiyen can understand that it would have hurt him
very badly. But ,
Sri Venkatesh didn't project that "hurt" in his later postings & was
kind in taking that
also somewhat lightly though he couldn't have digested his
interpretation of Sri Ramesh's statement .
Unquote*******************************************************************
First, please accept my sincere apologies, because my wordings in my
post made you think that I have misinterpreted and I have been hurt.
In reality no. I did not interpret what Sri Ramesh wrote as "against
the ThiruvallikkENi vaasees". Actually Sri Ramesh was very much right
in writing ".. altogether different in executing it day-in and
day-out..". None of us, atleast, to be true, myself, are strictly
following what Krishna has said in Bhagavadh Gita day-in and day-out.
My interpretation was Sri Ramesh is exactly bringing out this point.
Actually the thrust in my lines on the above is only that "Just
because the prapannas are not following, exactly, what the
GeethAchAryan has said, the PerumAL in the Divya DEsam does not lose
His prominence to another PerumAL in another Divya DEsam. Here this
was Ahobilam. I was only presenting my view that ThiruvallikkENi,
Srirangam, ThiruvEngadam and Thiruatthiyur emberumAns are "osatthi"
compared to Ahobilam. Once again this a part of the divine argument
that is going on.
I also concluded that "..I have no disregards for Ahobilam in anyway
or could there be any for anybody. All the above is meant only in a
lighter vein."
So, I reiterate that I have not misterpreted what Sri Ramesh wrote and
also that I has not hurt me in any way. I once again place my sincere
apologies if I have hurt any one's feeling.
adiyEn RAmAnuja dAsan
Thirumalai Vinjamoor Venkatesh
- Next message: Ramanbil_at_aol.com: "(no subject)"
- Previous message: Sadagopan: "Re: sannyasa dharmam- clarification please!"
- Next in thread: TV.Venkat_at_frco.com: "Re: Interpretation"
- Maybe reply: TV.Venkat_at_frco.com: "Re: Interpretation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
