Re: Bhakti List Moderation Policy
From the Bhakti List Archives
Mani Varadarajan • Thu Aug 13 1998 - 14:38:49 PDT
A couple of follow-on points:
(a) Dileepan mentioned that I took issue as moderator
with some words used in an article by another member
of the List. After discussion with the author, he
and I agreed to post the article in whatever form
the author wished.
(b) There is essentially no restriction on who can join
or leave the list. The only reason to have a "subscription"
step is to have truly interested parties take that little
bit of effort to join, and to prevent known abusers
on the Internet (i.e., people who join mailing lists
simply to fight or post advertisements) from joining.
No known abusers have attempted to join, so I can remove
the subscription step as well.
In other words, there is really no subscription moderation,
as I do not know most of the people before they join the list,
and can hardly approve or disapprove of them.
(c) We are all, as far as I am concerned, parama bhAgavatas,
and as such, I ask all of you to take a moment to consider
what you think of the moderation idea, and contribute your
thoughts.
Mani
- Next message: Bharadwaj, Jaganath: "Re: Lord Hayagriva"
- Previous message: muralidhar rangaswamy: "Re: kAmAsikhAshTakam"
- In reply to: Parthasarati Dileepan: "Re: Bhakti List Moderation Policy"
- Next in thread: Ramanbil_at_aol.com: "Re: Bhakti List Moderation Policy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
