Re: Bhakti List Moderation Policy
From the Bhakti List Archives
• August 13, 1998
A couple of follow-on points: (a) Dileepan mentioned that I took issue as moderator with some words used in an article by another member of the List. After discussion with the author, he and I agreed to post the article in whatever form the author wished. (b) There is essentially no restriction on who can join or leave the list. The only reason to have a "subscription" step is to have truly interested parties take that little bit of effort to join, and to prevent known abusers on the Internet (i.e., people who join mailing lists simply to fight or post advertisements) from joining. No known abusers have attempted to join, so I can remove the subscription step as well. In other words, there is really no subscription moderation, as I do not know most of the people before they join the list, and can hardly approve or disapprove of them. (c) We are all, as far as I am concerned, parama bhAgavatas, and as such, I ask all of you to take a moment to consider what you think of the moderation idea, and contribute your thoughts. Mani
- Next message: Bharadwaj, Jaganath: "Re: Lord Hayagriva"
- Previous message: muralidhar rangaswamy: "Re: kAmAsikhAshTakam"
- In reply to: Parthasarati Dileepan: "Re: Bhakti List Moderation Policy"
- Next in thread: Ramanbil_at_aol.com: "Re: Bhakti List Moderation Policy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]